Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA): Contact allergies in relation to body sites in patients with allergic contact dermatitis.
Oosterhaven, Jart A F; Uter, Wolfgang; Aberer, Werner; Armario-Hita, José C; Ballmer-Weber, Barbara K; Bauer, Andrea; Czarnecka-Operacz, Magdalena; Elsner, Peter; García-Gavín, Juan; Giménez-Arnau, Ana M; John, Swen M; Krecisz, Beata; Mahler, Vera; Rustemeyer, Thomas; Sadowska-Przytocka, Anna; Sánchez-Pérez, Javier; Simon, Dagmar; Valiukeviciene, Skaidra; Weisshaar, Elke; Schuttelaar, Marie L A.
Affiliation
  • Oosterhaven JAF; Department of Dermatology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Uter W; Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen/Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Aberer W; Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
  • Armario-Hita JC; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Puerto Real, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain.
  • Ballmer-Weber BK; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zürich and Clinic of Dermatology and Allergology, Kantonsspital St Gallen, Zürich, Switzerland.
  • Bauer A; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, University Allergy Centre, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
  • Czarnecka-Operacz M; Department of Dermatology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
  • Elsner P; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.
  • García-Gavín J; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Complex, Faculty of Medicine, A Coruña, Santiago de Compostela; also: Dermatological Office, Vigo, Spain.
  • Giménez-Arnau AM; Department of Dermatology, Hospital del Mar, IMIM Universitat Autònoma, Barcelona, Spain.
  • John SM; Department of Dermatology and Environmental Medicine, Institute for Interdisciplinary Dermatologic Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm), Lower Saxony Institute for Occupational Dermatology (NIB), University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.
  • Krecisz B; Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, The Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.
  • Mahler V; Department of Dermatology, University of Erlangen/Nürnberg, Erlangen, Bavaria.
  • Rustemeyer T; Division of Allergology, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, Germany.
  • Sadowska-Przytocka A; Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Sánchez-Pérez J; Department of Dermatology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
  • Simon D; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
  • Valiukeviciene S; Department of Dermatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Weisshaar E; Department of Skin and Venereal Diseases, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
  • Schuttelaar MLA; Department of Clinical Social Medicine, Environmental and Occupational Dermatology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Contact Dermatitis ; 80(5): 263-272, 2019 May.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30520058
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Analyses of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA) database have focused primarily on the prevalence of contact allergies to the European baseline series, both overall and in subgroups of patients. However, affected body sites have hitherto not been addressed.

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the prevalence of contact allergies for distinct body sites in patients with allergic contact dermatitis (ACD).

METHODS:

Analysis of data collected by the ESSCA (www.essca-dc.org) in consecutively patch tested patients, from 2009 to 2014, in eight European countries was performed. Cases were selected on the basis of the presence of minimally one positive patch test reaction to the baseline series, and a final diagnosis of ACD attributed to only one body site.

RESULTS:

Six thousand two hundred and fifty-five cases were analysed. The head and hand were the most common single sites that ACD was attributed to. Differences between countries were seen for several body sites. Nickel, fragrance mix I, cobalt and methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone were the most frequent allergens reported for various body sites.

CONCLUSIONS:

Distinct allergen patterns per body site were observed. However, contact allergies were probably not always relevant for the dermatitis that patients presented with. The possibility of linking positive patch test reactions to relevance, along with affected body sites, should be a useful addition to patch test documentation systems.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Dermatitis, Allergic Contact / Dermatitis, Occupational / Facial Dermatoses / Hand Dermatoses / Leg Dermatoses Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Contact Dermatitis Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Dermatitis, Allergic Contact / Dermatitis, Occupational / Facial Dermatoses / Hand Dermatoses / Leg Dermatoses Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Contact Dermatitis Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands
...