Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Value and Limitations of Broad Brush Surveys Used in Community-Randomized Trials in Southern Africa.
Bond, Virginia; Ngwenya, Fredrick; Murray, Emma; Ngwenya, Nothando; Viljoen, Lario; Gumede, Dumile; Bwalya, Chiti; Mantantana, Jabulile; Hoddinott, Graeme; Dodd, Peter J; Ayles, Helen; Simwinga, Musonda; Wallman, Sandra; Seeley, Janet.
Affiliation
  • Bond V; 1 Zambart, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
  • Ngwenya F; 2 Department of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
  • Murray E; 1 Zambart, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
  • Ngwenya N; 3 Desmond Tutu TB Centre, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • Viljoen L; 3 Desmond Tutu TB Centre, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • Gumede D; 3 Desmond Tutu TB Centre, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • Bwalya C; 4 Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
  • Mantantana J; 1 Zambart, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
  • Hoddinott G; 3 Desmond Tutu TB Centre, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • Dodd PJ; 3 Desmond Tutu TB Centre, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • Ayles H; 5 School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
  • Simwinga M; 1 Zambart, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
  • Wallman S; 2 Department of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
  • Seeley J; 1 Zambart, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Qual Health Res ; 29(5): 700-718, 2019 04.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30556470
ABSTRACT
We describe and reflect on a rapid qualitative survey approach called "Broad Brush Survey" (BBS) used in six community-randomized trials (CRTs)/studies in Zambia and South Africa (2004-2018) to document, compare, classify, and communicate community features systematically for public health and multidisciplinary research ends. BBS is based on a set sequence of participatory qualitative methods and fieldwork carried out prior to a CRT intervention and/or research by social scientists to generate rapid community profiles using four key indicators physical features, social organization, networks, and community narratives. Profiling makes apparent similarities and differences, enabling comparison across communities and can be facilitated by an ideal model of open-closed systems. Findings have provided practical outputs (e.g., community profiles) and academic opportunities (e.g., community typologies). The BBS approach enables complex social landscapes to be incorporated in CRTs. This method has proven to be useful, adaptable and to have multidisciplinary appeal.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Qualitative Research / Community-Based Participatory Research Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Africa Language: En Journal: Qual Health Res Journal subject: ENFERMAGEM / PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Zambia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Qualitative Research / Community-Based Participatory Research Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Africa Language: En Journal: Qual Health Res Journal subject: ENFERMAGEM / PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Zambia