Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Multi-observer contouring of male pelvic anatomy: Highly variable agreement across conventional and emerging structures of interest.
Roach, Dale; Holloway, Lois C; Jameson, Michael G; Dowling, Jason A; Kennedy, Angel; Greer, Peter B; Krawiec, Michele; Rai, Robba; Denham, Jim; De Leon, Jeremiah; Lim, Karen; Berry, Megan E; White, Rohen T; Bydder, Sean A; Tan, Hendrick T; Croker, Jeremy D; McGrath, Alycea; Matthews, John; Smeenk, Robert J; Ebert, Martin A.
Affiliation
  • Roach D; Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Holloway LC; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Jameson MG; Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Dowling JA; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Kennedy A; Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Greer PB; Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Krawiec M; Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Rai R; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Denham J; Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
  • De Leon J; Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Lim K; Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Berry ME; Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
  • White RT; Australian e-Health Research Centre, CSIRO, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Bydder SA; School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Tan HT; Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
  • Croker JD; School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
  • McGrath A; Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Matthews J; Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
  • Smeenk RJ; Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Ebert MA; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol ; 63(2): 264-271, 2019 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30609205
INTRODUCTION: This study quantified inter-observer contouring variations for multiple male pelvic structures, many of which are of emerging relevance for prostate cancer radiotherapy progression and toxicity response studies. METHODS: Five prostate cancer patient datasets (CT and T2-weighted MR) were distributed to 13 observers for contouring. CT structures contoured included the clinical target volume (CTV), seminal vesicles, rectum, colon, bowel bag, bladder and peri-rectal space (PRS). MR contours included CTV, trigone, membranous urethra, penile bulb, neurovascular bundle and multiple pelvic floor muscles. Contouring variations were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and multiple additional metrics. RESULTS: Clinical target volume (CT and MR), bladder, rectum and PRS contours showed excellent inter-observer agreement (median ICC = 0.97; 0.99; 1.00; 0.95; 0.90, DSC = 0.83 ± 0.05; 0.88 ± 0.05; 0.93 ± 0.03; 0.81 ± 0.07; 0.80 ± 0.06, respectively). Seminal vesicle contours were more variable (ICC = 0.75, DSC = 0.73 ± 0.14), while colon and bowel bag contoured volumes were consistent (ICC = 0.97; 0.97), but displayed poor overlap (DSC = 0.58 ± 0.22; 0.67 ± 0.21). Smaller MR structures showed significant inter-observer variations, with poor overlap for trigone, membranous urethra, penile bulb, and left and right neurovascular bundles (DSC = 0.44 ± 0.22; 0.41 ± 0.21; 0.66 ± 0.21; 0.16 ± 0.17; 0.15 ± 0.15). Pelvic floor muscles recorded moderate to strong inter-observer agreement (ICC = 0.50-0.97), although large outlier variations were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Inter-observer contouring variation was significant for multiple pelvic structures contoured on MR.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pelvis / Prostatic Neoplasms / Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / NEOPLASIAS / RADIOLOGIA Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia Country of publication: Australia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pelvis / Prostatic Neoplasms / Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / NEOPLASIAS / RADIOLOGIA Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia Country of publication: Australia