Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Continuous exercise induces airway epithelium damage while a matched-intensity and volume intermittent exercise does not.
Combes, Adrien; Dekerle, Jeanne; Dumont, Xavier; Twomey, Rosie; Bernard, Alfred; Daussin, Frédéric; Bougault, Valérie.
Affiliation
  • Combes A; URePSSS, Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société, Lille, France.
  • Dekerle J; Fatigue and Exercise Laboratory, Centre for Sport Exercise Science and Medicine (SESAME), University of Brighton, Eastbourne, UK.
  • Dumont X; Louvain Center of Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Twomey R; Fatigue and Exercise Laboratory, Centre for Sport Exercise Science and Medicine (SESAME), University of Brighton, Eastbourne, UK.
  • Bernard A; Louvain Center of Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Daussin F; URePSSS, Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société, Lille, France.
  • Bougault V; URePSSS, Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société, Lille, France. valerie.bougault@univ-lille2.fr.
Respir Res ; 20(1): 12, 2019 Jan 17.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30654798
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

While continuous exercise (CE) induces greater ventilation ([Formula see text]E) when compared to intermittent exercise (IE), little is known of the consequences on airway damage. Our aim was to investigate markers of epithelial cell damage - i.e. serum levels of CC16 and of the CC16/SP-D ratio - during and following a bout of CE and IE of matched work.

METHODS:

Sixteen healthy young adults performed a 30-min continuous (CE) and a 60-min intermittent exercise (IE; 1-min work 1-min rest) on separate occasions in a random order. Intensity was set at 70% of their maximum work rate (WRmax). Heart rate (HR) and [Formula see text]E were measured throughout both tests. Blood samples were taken at rest, after the 10th min of the warm-up, at the end of both exercises, half way through IE (matched time but 50% work done for IE) as well as 30- and 60-min post-exercise. Lactate and CC16 and SP-D were determined.

RESULTS:

Mean [Formula see text]E was higher for CE compared to IE (85 ± 17 l.min- 1 vs 50 ± 8 l.min- 1, respectively; P < 0.001). Serum-based markers of epithelial cell damage remained unchanged during IE. Interaction of test × time was observed for SP-D (P = 0.02), CC16 (µg.l- 1) (P = 0.006) and CC16/SP-D ratio (P = 0.03). Maximum delta CC16/SP-D was significantly correlated with mean [Formula see text]E sustained (r = 0.83, P < 0.001) during CE but not during IE.

CONCLUSION:

The 30-min CE performed at 70% WRmax induced mild airway damage, while a time- or work-matched IE did not. The extent of the damage during CE was associated with the higher ventilation rate.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Exercise / Inflammation Mediators / Respiratory Mucosa / Exercise Test / Respiratory Rate Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Adult / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Respir Res Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: France

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Exercise / Inflammation Mediators / Respiratory Mucosa / Exercise Test / Respiratory Rate Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Adult / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Respir Res Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: France