Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prospective examination of the changes in the urinary microbiome induced by transrectal biopsy of the prostate using 16S rRNA gene analysis.
Alanee, Shaheen; El-Zawahry, Ahmed; Dynda, Danuta; McVary, Kevin; Karr, Mallory; Braundmeier-Fleming, Andrea.
Affiliation
  • Alanee S; Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA. salanee1@hfhs.org.
  • El-Zawahry A; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA.
  • Dynda D; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA.
  • McVary K; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA.
  • Karr M; Department of Medical Microbiology, Immunology, and Cell Biology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA.
  • Braundmeier-Fleming A; Department of Medical Microbiology, Immunology, and Cell Biology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis ; 22(3): 446-452, 2019 09.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30664733
OBJECTIVES: To prospectively examine the changes in microbiota within the urinary tract after transrectal prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data, urine, and fecal samples prospectively collected from 30 patients before and after transrectal biopsy of the prostate. DNA was extracted from urine collected after a prostate massage before and after prostate biopsy, and from fecal samples collected before the biopsy. We sequenced DNA using the bacterial 16S rRNA high-throughput next-generation sequencing and analyzed changes in microbial profiles for taxonomy comparison between samples. RESULTS: Pre-biopsy urinary microbial profiles contained Lactobacillus and Staphylococcus bacteria. Post-biopsy urinary microbial profiles included lower levels of Lactobacillus and higher levels of Prevotella bacteria. Bacteroides bacteria were predominant in fecal samples. We identified two clustering patterns containing both pre- and post-biopsy urine samples. Cluster 1 had a urine cluster pattern that was distinct from fecal, whereas cluster 2 was similar to fecal. We observed two different modes of microbial changes, 11 patients had both of their urine (pre and post) samples associated with a particular cluster group, whereas others (n = 15) had movement between clusters 1 and 2 following the biopsy procedure. Four patient's post-biopsy urine microbial profiles clustered very tightly to the fecal microbial profile. CONCLUSIONS: We describe two models of change in the urinary tract microbiota after prostate biopsy using 16S RNA gene analysis. Further research to determine what controls changes in the urinary microbiota after prostate biopsy can help us understand why some patients are more susceptible to develop post-biopsy infections.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostatic Neoplasms / Rectum / Bacteria / Urinary Tract / Microbiota Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Journal subject: ENDOCRINOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS / UROLOGIA Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostatic Neoplasms / Rectum / Bacteria / Urinary Tract / Microbiota Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Journal subject: ENDOCRINOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS / UROLOGIA Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United kingdom