Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Stand and Move at Work sedentary behavior questionnaire: validity and sensitivity to change.
Toledo, Meynard John L; Mullane, Sarah L; Larouche, Miranda L; Rydell, Sarah A; Mitchell, Nathan R; Pereira, Mark A; Buman, Matthew P.
Affiliation
  • Toledo MJL; College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ.
  • Mullane SL; College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ.
  • Larouche ML; College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ.
  • Rydell SA; Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Mitchell NR; Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Pereira MA; Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Buman MP; College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ. Electronic address: matthew.buman@asu.edu.
Ann Epidemiol ; 31: 62-68.e1, 2019 03.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30718055
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

We evaluated the validity and sensitivity to change of a workplace questionnaire to assess sedentary behavior (SB) during and outside work.

METHODS:

Participants wore an activPAL and completed an SB questionnaire at two time points (baseline and 3-month follow-up). Ecological momentary assessments were used to assess workplace location (at desk vs. away from desk). Intraclass correlation coefficients, mean difference, root of mean square error, kappa agreement, and Bland-Altman plots assessed validity. Sensitivity to change after 3 months of intervention was assessed using the standardized effect size.

RESULTS:

Data from 546 participants (age = 45.1 ± 16.4 years, 24.9% males, 72.7% white) were analyzed. Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.08 to 0.23. SB was overestimated d¯(95%CI)[] by 47.9 (39.2, 56.6) min during work hours but underestimated for both non-work hours and nonworkdays by -38.3 (-47.4, 29.1) and -106.7 (124.0, -89.5) min, respectively. Participants slightly underestimated SB by -3.4 (-12.6, 5.7)% when at their desk but overestimated SB by 2.8 (-2.4, 8.0)% when not at their desk. The questionnaire demonstrated similar standardized effect size (>0.6) to the activPAL for sedentary and standing time.

CONCLUSIONS:

Agreement between the questionnaire and activPAL was on par with other self-report measures. The questionnaire yielded valid estimates of at/away from desk SB and was sensitive to change.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Urban Population / Exercise / Surveys and Questionnaires / Workplace / Sedentary Behavior / Accelerometry Type of study: Diagnostic_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Ann Epidemiol Journal subject: EPIDEMIOLOGIA Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Azerbaijan

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Urban Population / Exercise / Surveys and Questionnaires / Workplace / Sedentary Behavior / Accelerometry Type of study: Diagnostic_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Ann Epidemiol Journal subject: EPIDEMIOLOGIA Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Azerbaijan