Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The threshold detectable mass diameter for 2D-mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
Hadjipanteli, Andria; Elangovan, Premkumar; Mackenzie, Alistair; Wells, Kevin; Dance, David R; Young, Kenneth C.
Affiliation
  • Hadjipanteli A; National Coordinating Centre for the Physics of Mammography, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, Surrey, UK; Medical School, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus. Electronic address: hadjipanteli.andria@ucy.ac.cy.
  • Elangovan P; National Coordinating Centre for the Physics of Mammography, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, Surrey, UK.
  • Mackenzie A; National Coordinating Centre for the Physics of Mammography, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, Surrey, UK.
  • Wells K; Centre for Vision, Speech and Signal Processing, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
  • Dance DR; National Coordinating Centre for the Physics of Mammography, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, Surrey, UK; Department of Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
  • Young KC; National Coordinating Centre for the Physics of Mammography, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, Surrey, UK; Department of Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Phys Med ; 57: 25-32, 2019 Jan.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30738528
ABSTRACT
Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is currently under consideration for replacement of, or combined use with 2D-mammography in national breast screening programmes. To investigate the potential benefits that DBT can bring to screening, the threshold detectable lesion diameters were measured for different forms of DBT in comparison to 2D-mammography. The aim of this study was to compare the threshold detectable mass diameters obtained with narrow angle (15°/15 projections) and wide angle (50°/25 projections) DBT in comparison to 2D-mammography. Simulated images of 60 mm thick compressed breasts were produced with and without masses using a set of validated image modelling tools for 2D-mammography and DBT. Image processing and reconstruction were performed using commercial software. A series of 4-alternative forced choice (4AFC) experiments was conducted for signal detection with the masses as targets. The threshold detectable mass diameter was found for each imaging modality with a mean glandular dose of 2.5 mGy. The resulting values of the threshold diameter for 2D-mammography (10.2 ±â€¯1.4 mm) were found to be larger (p < 0.001) than those for narrow angle DBT (6.0 ±â€¯1.1 mm) and wide angle DBT (5.6 ±â€¯1.2 mm). There was no significant difference between the threshold diameters for wide and narrow angle DBT. Implications for the introduction of DBT alone or in combination with 2D-mammography in breast cancer screening are discussed.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Breast Neoplasms / Mammography / Tumor Burden Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Phys Med Journal subject: BIOFISICA / BIOLOGIA / MEDICINA Year: 2019 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Breast Neoplasms / Mammography / Tumor Burden Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Phys Med Journal subject: BIOFISICA / BIOLOGIA / MEDICINA Year: 2019 Document type: Article
...