Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies.
Somigliana, Edgardo; Busnelli, Andrea; Paffoni, Alessio; Vigano, Paola; Riccaboni, Alessandra; Rubio, Carmen; Capalbo, Antonio.
Affiliation
  • Somigliana E; Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; Obstetrics-Gynecology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: dadosomigliana@yahoo.it.
  • Busnelli A; Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
  • Paffoni A; ART Unit, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Lariana, Come, Italy.
  • Vigano P; Obstetrics-Gynecology Department, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
  • Riccaboni A; Obstetrics-Gynecology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
  • Rubio C; Igenomix, Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Valencia, Spain.
  • Capalbo A; Igenomix, Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Marostica, and La Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Fertil Steril ; 111(6): 1169-1176, 2019 06.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30777289
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the economical benefit of preimplantation genetic testing of aneuploidies (PGT-A) when applied in an extended culture and stringent elective single ET framework.

DESIGN:

Theoretical cost-effectiveness study.

SETTING:

Not applicable. PATIENTS/ANIMAL(S) None. INTERVENTION(S) Comparison of the cost-effectiveness between two IVF treatment strategies serial transfer of all available blastocysts without genetic testing (first fresh transfer and subsequent frozen-thawed transfer); and systematic use of genetic testing (trophectoderm biopsy, freeze-all, and frozen-thawed transfers of euploid blastocysts). The costs considered for this analysis are based on regional public health system provider. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Costs per live birth. RESULT(S) Cost-effectiveness profile of PGT-A improves with female age and number of available blastocysts. Sensitivity analyses varying the costs of ET, the costs of genetic analyses, the magnitude of the detrimental impact of PGT-A on live birth rate, and the crude live birth rates change to some extent the thresholds for effectiveness but generally confirm the notion that PGT-A can be economically advantageous in some specific subgroups. CONCLUSION(S) PGT-A can be cost-effective in specific clinical settings and population groups. Economic considerations deserve attention in the debate regarding the clinical utility of PGT-A.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Genetic Testing / Health Care Costs / Preimplantation Diagnosis / Reproductive Techniques, Assisted / Embryo Culture Techniques / Genetic Diseases, Inborn / Infertility / Aneuploidy Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Fertil Steril Year: 2019 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Genetic Testing / Health Care Costs / Preimplantation Diagnosis / Reproductive Techniques, Assisted / Embryo Culture Techniques / Genetic Diseases, Inborn / Infertility / Aneuploidy Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Fertil Steril Year: 2019 Document type: Article