Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Postoperative structured rehabilitation in patients undergoing surgery for cervical radiculopathy: a 2-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
Peolsson, Anneli; Löfgren, Håkan; Dedering, Åsa; Öberg, Birgitta; Zsigmond, Peter; Hedevik, Henrik; Wibault, Johanna.
Affiliation
  • Peolsson A; 1Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping.
  • Löfgren H; 2Neuro-Orthopedic Center, Ryhov Hospital, Region Jönköping County, Jönköping.
  • Dedering Å; 3Allied Health Professionals Function, Function Area Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm.
  • Öberg B; 4Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm.
  • Zsigmond P; 1Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping.
  • Hedevik H; 5Department of Neurosurgery, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping; and.
  • Wibault J; 1Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping.
J Neurosurg Spine ; 31(1): 60-69, 2019 03 22.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30901755
OBJECTIVE: Information about postoperative rehabilitation for cervical radiculopathy (CR) is scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate the additional benefits of structured postoperative rehabilitation (SPT), which was performed in all patients, compared with a pragmatic standard postoperative approach (SA), in which rehabilitation was used as needed and patients sought physiotherapy on their own without a referral, in patients with MRI evidence of disc herniation and concomitant clinical signs who underwent surgery for CR. METHODS: Patients (n = 202) were randomized to receive SPT or SA. Included key variables in the present study were primary and selected secondary outcomes of a prospective randomized controlled multicenter study. The main outcome was the Neck Disability Index (NDI) score. The NDI score, pain variables, self-efficacy, and health-related quality of life were investigated at baseline and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. RESULTS: SPT provided no additional benefits over SA (p = 0.08 to p = 0.99) at the postoperative 2-year follow-up. Both groups improved over time (p < 0.0001), with no reported adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: One can conclude that SPT offered no additional benefits over SA; however, patients tolerated postoperative neck exercises without any negative side effects. These findings are important for the development of future active and neck-specific postoperative rehabilitation interventions for patients with CR.Clinical trial registration no.: NCT01547611 (clinicaltrials.gov).
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiculopathy Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Neurosurg Spine Journal subject: NEUROCIRURGIA Year: 2019 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiculopathy Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Neurosurg Spine Journal subject: NEUROCIRURGIA Year: 2019 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States