Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Descent and hypermobility of the rectum in women with obstructed defecation symptoms.
Rostaminia, Ghazaleh; Abramowitch, Steven; Chang, Cecilia; Goldberg, Roger P.
Affiliation
  • Rostaminia G; Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery (FPMRS), Division of Urogynecology, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, 9650 Gross Point Road, Suite 3900, Skokie, IL, 60076, USA. ghazalerostaminia@yahoo.com.
  • Abramowitch S; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Chang C; NorthShore University HealthSystem Research Institute, Evanston, IL, USA.
  • Goldberg RP; Division of Urogynecology, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Skokie, IL, USA.
Int Urogynecol J ; 31(2): 337-349, 2020 02.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31016336
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION AND

HYPOTHESIS:

Obstructed defecation symptoms (ODS) are common in women; however, the key underlying anatomic factors remain poorly understood. We investigated rectal mobility and support defects in women with and without ODS using pelvic floor ultrasound and MR defecography.

METHODS:

This prospective case-control study categorized subjects based on questions 7, 8 and 14 on the PFDI-20, which asks about obstructed defecation symptoms. All subjects underwent an interview, examination and pelvic floor ultrasound, and a subset of 16 subjects underwent MR defecography. The cul de sac-to-anorectal junction distance at rest and during maximum strain was measured on ultrasound and MRI images. The 'compression ratio' was calculated by dividing the change in rectovaginal septum length by its rest length to quantify rectal folding and hypermobility during dynamic imaging and to correlate with ODS.

RESULTS:

Sixty-two women were recruited, 32 cases and 30 controls. There were no statistically significant differences in age, parity, BMI or stage of rectocele between groups. A threshold analysis indicated the risk of ODS was 32 times greater (OR 32.5, 95% CI 4.8-217.1, p = 0.0003) among women with a high compression ratio (≥ 14) compared with those with a low compression ratio (< 14) after controlling for age, BMI, parity, stool type and BM frequency.

CONCLUSIONS:

Female ODS are associated with distinct alterations in rectal mobility and support that can be clearly observed on dynamic ultrasound. The defects in rectal support were quantifiable using a compression ratio metric, and these defects strongly predicted the likelihood of symptoms; interestingly, the presence or degree of rectocele defects played no role. These findings may provide new insight into the anatomic factors underlying female ODS.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Constipation / Defecography / Rectocele / Defecation / Gastrointestinal Motility Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Int Urogynecol J Journal subject: GINECOLOGIA / UROLOGIA Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Constipation / Defecography / Rectocele / Defecation / Gastrointestinal Motility Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Int Urogynecol J Journal subject: GINECOLOGIA / UROLOGIA Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States