Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of Positioning of the Region of Interest on Bone Density of the Hip.
Feit, Avery; Levin, Natan; McNamara, Elizabeth A; Sinha, Partha; Whittaker, LaTarsha G; Malabanan, Alan O; Rosen, Harold N.
Affiliation
  • Feit A; Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Levin N; Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
  • McNamara EA; Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Sinha P; Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Whittaker LG; Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Malabanan AO; Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Rosen HN; Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: hrosen@bidmc.harvard.edu.
J Clin Densitom ; 23(3): 426-431, 2020.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31036446
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Large changes in positioning of the global region of interest (ROI) influence the measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) in the hip and forearm regions. However, it is unknown whether minor shifts in the positioning of the bottom of the global hip ROI affect the measurement of total hip BMD.

METHODS:

The hip BMDs of 40 clinical densitometry patients were analyzed at baseline with the bottom of the global hip ROI positioned as usual, 10 mm distal to the base of the lesser trochanter (position 0). Then the hip was reanalyzed by shifting the bottom of the global hip ROI 1 mm proximally 10 times (positions +1 through +10) and then by shifting the bottom of the global hip ROI 1 mm distally 10 times (positions -1 through -10). The significance of the differences between mean values at the various distances from baseline was assessed using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS:

The mean total hip area, bone mineral content and BMD decreased as the bottom of the global hip ROI was shifted proximally; the decrease was significant when shifted by even 1 mm (p < 0.001). The mean total hip area, bone mineral content and BMD increased as the bottom of the global hip ROI was shifted distally; the increase was significant when shifted by even 1 mm (p < 0.001). The change in BMD with each 1 mm shift was uniform across the range studied from positions +10 through -10, and was approx 0.54%/mm. When the least significant change was based on 40 pairs of measurements, where each pair was comprised of the baseline scan and the same scan at -1 position, the least significant change was 0.01 g/cm2.

CONCLUSIONS:

The BMD of the total hip is sensitive to even minor changes in the positioning of the bottom of the global hip ROI. Although a 1 mm change in the bottom of the global hip ROI positioning would make little difference in the reported T-score, it could easily affect the determination of significance in changes in BMD over time.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Absorptiometry, Photon / Bone Density / Femur Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Clin Densitom Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Absorptiometry, Photon / Bone Density / Femur Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Clin Densitom Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States
...