Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Value of Confocal Laser Endoscopy in Assessing the Quality of Duodenal Ulcer Healing.
Rong, Jianfang; Zhang, Liang; Liao, Wangdi; Xie, Yong; Lu, Nonghua; Shu, Xu.
Affiliation
  • Rong J; Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006 Jiangxi, China.
  • Zhang L; Department of Medical, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi Medical College, Shangrao, 334000 Jiangxi, China.
  • Liao W; Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006 Jiangxi, China.
  • Xie Y; Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006 Jiangxi, China.
  • Lu N; Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006 Jiangxi, China.
  • Shu X; Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006 Jiangxi, China.
Lasers Surg Med ; 51(8): 701-708, 2019 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31074497
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVE:

Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) is a novel endoscopic technique that can image cells and subcellular layers of the gastric mucosa in vivo. We aimed to investigate the value of CLE in assessing the quality of ulcer healing (QOUH) and preliminarily establish evaluation criteria. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Patients with duodenal ulcers were enrolled. After duodenal ulcer healing, we compared the value of CLE and white light endoscopy (WLE) in assessing the QOUH by using the histopathological diagnosis as the gold standard. At the same time, immunohistochemistry was performed to examine the expressions of transforming growth factor ß1 (TGF-ß1) and fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF-2) in normal and scar tissues.

RESULTS:

In assessing the QOUH classified as poor, good, and excellent by the pathological classification, the sensitivity of WLE was 57.14%, 50%, and 47.06%, the specificity was 87.80%, 52.38%, and 81.58%, and the accuracy was 80.00%, 50.91%, and 70.91%, respectively. Meanwhile, the sensitivity of CLE was 73.33%, 85.19%, and 92.31%, the specificity was 95%, 85.71%, and 92.86%, and the accuracy was 89.09%, 85.45%, and 92.73%, respectively. The κ value for the correlation with pathological diagnosis grade was 0.38 for WLE vs. 0.74 for CLE. The assessment of the QOUH in the CLE image classification showed great improvement compared with that in the WLE image classification. The image classification of CLE was not associated with the immunohistochemical expression of TGF-ß1 or FGF-2 according the Spearman rank correlation (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

Compared with WLE, CLE has a higher value in assessing the QOUH. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Wound Healing / Duodenoscopy / Microscopy, Confocal / Duodenal Ulcer / Intestinal Mucosa / Lasers Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Lasers Surg Med Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Wound Healing / Duodenoscopy / Microscopy, Confocal / Duodenal Ulcer / Intestinal Mucosa / Lasers Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Lasers Surg Med Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China