Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Improving the practice of inferior vena cava filter retrieval: a quality improvement intervention and audit outcomes.
Peress, Luisa; Kamil, Sally; Fernandez, Maria; Lastimosa, Rowena; Jaffer, Ounali; Patel, Snehal; Akhtar, Mohammed Rashid; Kyaw Tun, Jimmy.
Affiliation
  • Peress L; 1 Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, Whitechapel Rd, London, UK.
  • Kamil S; 2 Barts and the London SMD, Queen Mary University, 4 Newark St, London, UK.
  • Fernandez M; 1 Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, Whitechapel Rd, London, UK.
  • Lastimosa R; 3 The University of Jordan Queen Rania St, Amman, Jordan.
  • Jaffer O; 1 Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, Whitechapel Rd, London, UK.
  • Patel S; 1 Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, Whitechapel Rd, London, UK.
  • Akhtar MR; 1 Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, Whitechapel Rd, London, UK.
  • Kyaw Tun J; 1 Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, Whitechapel Rd, London, UK.
Br J Radiol ; 92(1100): 20190051, 2019 Aug.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31204842
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To review inferior vena cava (IVC) filter retrieval practice at our institution, the Royal London Hospital, and measure changes following a quality improvement intervention. IVC filters are a preventive treatment for pulmonary embolism when anticoagulation is ineffective/contraindicated. Unless permanent filtration is required, all filters should undergo attempted retrieval within manufacturer's recommendations with a success rate of ≥80 %.

METHODS:

Retrospective audit of filters inserted between 2011 and 2014, followed by a quality improvement intervention and a second audit between 2015 and 2017. Clinical-radiological data were analysed using the Picture Archiving and Communication System and electronic patient records.

RESULTS:

During the first audit, filter retrieval was attempted in 92% of cases, of which 82% underwent the procedure within manufacturer's recommendations and 86% were successful. During the second audit, an improvement across indicators was seen. Retrieval increased by 3% and was attempted in 95% of cases (92% of which were within manufacturer's guidelines). Rate of retrievals within manufacturer's guidelines increased by 10%. Filter retrieval success rate increased by 11% - to 97%.

CONCLUSIONS:

IVC filter retrieval practice at a single institution can be improved by implementing a simple audit intervention. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Filter retrieval practice has clinical and medicolegal implications. A simple quality intervention can substantially improve overall practice.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pulmonary Embolism / Vena Cava Filters / Device Removal / Quality Improvement / Medical Audit Type of study: Guideline / Observational_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Br J Radiol Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom Publication country: ENGLAND / ESCOCIA / GB / GREAT BRITAIN / INGLATERRA / REINO UNIDO / SCOTLAND / UK / UNITED KINGDOM

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pulmonary Embolism / Vena Cava Filters / Device Removal / Quality Improvement / Medical Audit Type of study: Guideline / Observational_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Br J Radiol Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom Publication country: ENGLAND / ESCOCIA / GB / GREAT BRITAIN / INGLATERRA / REINO UNIDO / SCOTLAND / UK / UNITED KINGDOM