Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Outcome of Live-Donor Renal Transplants With Incidentally Diagnosed Renal Angiomyolipoma in the Donor.
Zahran, Mohamed H; Kamal, Ahmed I; Abdelfattah, Ahmed; Mashaly, Mohamed Elsayed; Fakhreldin, Islam; Osman, Yasser; Ali-El-Dein, Bedeir.
Affiliation
  • Zahran MH; Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt. Electronic address: zahranmha822@gmail.com.
  • Kamal AI; Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
  • Abdelfattah A; Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
  • Mashaly ME; Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
  • Fakhreldin I; Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
  • Osman Y; Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
  • Ali-El-Dein B; Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Transplant Proc ; 51(6): 1773-1778, 2019.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31255355
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Accepting donors with renal lesion amenable for pre-transplant management with no suspected long-term harm seems to expand the live-donor pool. We aimed to assess the long-term outcome of live-donor renal transplantation with incidentally discovered renal angiomyolipoma (AML) during routine evaluation of donors. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

A retrospective evaluation of incidentally discovered AML, during live-related-donor evaluation, was performed. The tumor criteria were retrieved. In cases with exophytic tumor, a back-table, partial nephrectomy was done with frozen section to exclude malignancy. Endophytic lesions were kept in situ and transplanted. Both donor and recipient were followed up by periodic imaging.

RESULTS:

Among 2925 cases, 6 AML with a median volume of 0.96 (range, 0.5-2) cm2 were identified. The median recipients' age was 21 (range, 10-38) years and the median donors' age was 48 (range, 45-50). Two AML were exophytic and back-table partial nephrectomy was performed, while 4 were endophytic and kept in situ, and the kidney was transplanted. After a median follow-up of 82 (range, 25-150) months, 4 patients were alive with functioning grafts and 2 resumed hemodialysis 5 and 7 years after transplantation. There was no evidence of increase in the AML size or newly developed AML in the grafts. All donors were alive with normal renal function (mean ± standard deviation, serum creatinine was 0.9 ± 0.2 mg/dL) and none developed new AML in the remaining kidney.

CONCLUSION:

Incidentally discovered AML during live-donor evaluation is not a contraindication of donation after proper counseling of the couples and regular, periodic follow-up.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Kidney Transplantation / Angiomyolipoma / Tissue and Organ Harvesting / Donor Selection / Kidney Neoplasms / Nephrectomy Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Transplant Proc Year: 2019 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Kidney Transplantation / Angiomyolipoma / Tissue and Organ Harvesting / Donor Selection / Kidney Neoplasms / Nephrectomy Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Transplant Proc Year: 2019 Document type: Article
...