Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Increasing colorectal cancer screening orders using unlicensed assistive personnel.
Ishida, Kanako; Weiss, Erin; Kee, Summer A; Yingling, Charles T.
Affiliation
  • Ishida K; College of Nursing-Health Systems Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Weiss E; College of Nursing-Health Systems Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Kee SA; College of Nursing-Health Systems Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Yingling CT; College of Nursing-Health Systems Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
BMJ Open Qual ; 8(2): e000545, 2019.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31321316
ABSTRACT

Background:

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the leading cancer diagnoses affecting both men and women worldwide. Prevention and early detection of CRC is possible by increasing access to and utilisation of screening tests. Although CRC screening is highly recommended, screening rates remain suboptimal in the USA, particularly among underserved populations. Our project site, an urban federally qualified health centre, was not meeting the national screening target of 80% of eligible adults.

Objective:

The aim of this quality improvement project was to increase the number of orders for CRC screening to eligible patients by using unlicensed assistive personnel and automated telephone outreach calls to offer 100 patients CRC screening during an 8-week period.

Methods:

40 patients received outreach calls from care coordinators (CC). 40 patients received automated telephone call reminders to call a CC to obtain an order for CRC screening. 20 patients were offered CRC screening by a medical assistant (MA) as part of their scheduled office visits. We used two plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles to deliver these three screening interventions.

Results:

A total of 100 patients received one of the interventions. Ten of those patients received an order for either colonoscopy or faecal immunochemical testing by the conclusion of the second PDSA cycle. The MA-offered screening resulted in the highest percentage of patients accepting CRC screenings and patients preferred this outreach approach compared with CC outreach or automated voice messages. CC outreach yielded a lower rate of accepted screenings. None of the patients who received the automated calls followed up to obtain a screening order.

Conclusion:

Our project demonstrates that unlicensed assistive personnel have the potential to increase patient access to CRC screening.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Colorectal Neoplasms / Mass Screening / Health Personnel Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: BMJ Open Qual Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Colorectal Neoplasms / Mass Screening / Health Personnel Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: BMJ Open Qual Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States
...