Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing Organizational Supports for Evidence-Based Decision Making in Local Public Health Departments in the United States: Development and Psychometric Properties of a New Measure.
Mazzucca, Stephanie; Parks, Renee G; Tabak, Rachel G; Allen, Peg; Dobbins, Maureen; Stamatakis, Katherine A; Brownson, Ross C.
Affiliation
  • Mazzucca S; Prevention Research Center in St Louis, Brown School, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri (Drs Mazzucca, Tabak, Allen, and Brownson and Ms Parks); National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools and Health Evidence, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada (Dr Dobbins); Department of Epidemiology, College for Public Health & Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St Louis, Missouri (Dr Stamatakis); and Department of Surgery (Division of Public Health Sciences) and Alvin J.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 25(5): 454-463, 2019.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31348160
ABSTRACT
CONTEXT Fostering evidence-based decision making (EBDM) within local public health departments and among local health department (LHD) practitioners is crucial for the successful translation of research into public health practice to prevent and control chronic disease.

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this study was to identify organizational supports for EBDM within LHDs and determine psychometric properties of a measure of organizational supports for EBDM in LHDs.

DESIGN:

Cross-sectional, observation study.

SETTING:

Local public health departments in the United States.

PARTICIPANTS:

Local health department practitioners (N = 376) across the United States participated in the study. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Local health department practitioners completed a survey containing 27 items about organizational supports for EBDM. Most items were adapted from previously developed surveys, and input from researchers and practitioners guided survey development. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test and refine the psychometric properties of the measure.

RESULTS:

The final solution included 6 factors of 22 items awareness of EBDM (3 items), capacity for EBDM (7 items), resources availability (3 items), evaluation capacity (3 items), EBDM climate cultivation (3 items), and partnerships to support EBDM (3 items). This factor solution achieved acceptable fit (eg, Comparative Fit Index = 0.965). Logistic regression models showed positive relationships between the 6 factors and the number of evidence-based interventions delivered.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study identified important organizational supports for EBDM within LHDs. Results of this study can be used to understand and enhance organizational processes and structures to support EBDM to improve LHD performance and population health. Strong measures are important for understanding how LHDs support EBDM, evaluating interventions to improve LHD capacity, and to guide programmatic and policy efforts within LHDs.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Psychometrics / Public Health / Decision Support Techniques Type of study: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Patient_preference Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Public Health Manag Pract Journal subject: SAUDE PUBLICA / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Year: 2019 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Psychometrics / Public Health / Decision Support Techniques Type of study: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Patient_preference Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Public Health Manag Pract Journal subject: SAUDE PUBLICA / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Year: 2019 Document type: Article