Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Randomized clinical trial of prophylactic transanal irrigation versus supportive therapy to prevent symptoms of low anterior resection syndrome after rectal resection.
Rosen, H R; Kneist, W; Fürst, A; Krämer, G; Hebenstreit, J; Schiemer, J F.
Affiliation
  • Rosen HR; Faculty of Surgical Oncology, Sigmund Freud University Vienna Austria.
  • Kneist W; Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz Germany.
  • Fürst A; Department of Surgery, Caritas-Hospital St Josef Regensburg Germany.
  • Krämer G; Department of Surgery, Caritas-Hospital St Josef Regensburg Germany.
  • Hebenstreit J; Department of Surgery, Hospital St John of God Graz Austria.
  • Schiemer JF; Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz Germany.
BJS Open ; 3(4): 461-465, 2019 08.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31388638
Background: Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is a frequent problem after rectal resection. Transanal irrigation (TAI) has been suggested as an effective treatment in patients who have developed LARS. This prospective RCT was undertaken to evaluate the effect of TAI as a prophylactic treatment to prevent symptoms of LARS. Methods: Patients who had undergone ultralow rectal resection were randomized to start TAI on a daily basis, or to serve as a control with supportive therapy only after ileostomy closure. All patients were seen after 1 week, 1 month and 3 months, and the maximum number of defaecation episodes per day and night documented during follow-up. Wexner score, LARS score and Short Form 36 questionnaire responses were evaluated in both groups. Results: Thirty-seven patients could be evaluated according to protocol (TAI 18, control 19). The maximum number of stool episodes per day and per night was significantly lower among patients who underwent TAI at 1 month (median 3 versus 7 episodes/day in TAI versus control group, P = 0·003; 0 versus 3 episodes/night, P = 0·001) and 3 months (3 versus 5 episodes per day, P = 0·006; 0 versus 1 episodes/night, P = 0·002). LARS scores were significantly better in the TAI group after 1 month (median 16 versus 32 in control group; P = 0·044) and 3 months (9 versus 31; P = 0·001). A significantly better result in terms of Wexner score was seen in the TAI group after 3 months (median 2 versus 6 in controls; P = 0·046). Conclusion: Prophylactic TAI led to a significantly better functional outcome compared with supportive therapy for up to 3 months. Registration number: DRKS00011752 ( http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/).
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Anal Canal / Postoperative Complications / Proctectomy / Therapeutic Irrigation Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: BJS Open Year: 2019 Document type: Article Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Anal Canal / Postoperative Complications / Proctectomy / Therapeutic Irrigation Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: BJS Open Year: 2019 Document type: Article Country of publication: United kingdom