Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing of positive blood cultures: a comparison of the Accelerate Pheno™ and VITEK® 2 systems.
Schneider, Jack G; Wood, James B; Smith, Nathan W; Emery, Christopher L; Davis, Thomas E; Manaloor, John J; Bocian, Brittany; Schmitt, Bryan H.
Affiliation
  • Schneider JG; Ryan White Center for Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Global Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. Electronic address: jgschnei@iu.edu.
  • Wood JB; Ryan White Center for Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Global Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
  • Smith NW; Accelerate Diagnostics, Inc., Tucson, AZ, USA.
  • Emery CL; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
  • Davis TE; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
  • Manaloor JJ; Ryan White Center for Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Global Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
  • Bocian B; Indiana University Health Methodist and University Hospitals, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
  • Schmitt BH; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 95(3): 114841, 2019 Nov.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31422873
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To compare the performance and time-to-result (TTR) for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of positive blood cultures (PBC) using the Accelerate Pheno™ system (AXDX) and both a direct VITEK® 2 card inoculation workflow (DV2) and traditional FDA-approved VITEK® 2 workflow using subcultured isolates (V2).

METHODS:

Patient samples with monomicrobial Gram-negative rod bacteremia were tested on AXDX and DV2 in tandem and compared to V2 AST results. Categorical agreement (CA) errors were adjudicated using broth microdilution. Instrumentation times and AST TTR were compared.

RESULTS:

AXDX and DV2 had a CA of 93.4% and 97.4%, respectively, compared to V2. Postadjudication, AXDX, DV2, and V2 had CA of 94.7%, 95.7%, and 96.5%, respectively. Instrument run times were 6.6 h, 9.4 h, and 9.2 h, and AST TTR were 8.9 h, 12.9 h and 35.5 h, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

AXDX and DV2 ASTs are fast and reliable, which may have significant antimicrobial stewardship implications.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Microbial Sensitivity Tests / Diagnostic Tests, Routine / Blood Culture Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis Year: 2019 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Microbial Sensitivity Tests / Diagnostic Tests, Routine / Blood Culture Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis Year: 2019 Document type: Article