Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Single or double embryo transfer? Decision-making process in patients participating in an oocyte donation program.
Clua, Elisabet; Roca-Feliu, Marta; Tresánchez, Marta; Latre, Laura; Rodriguez, Ignacio; Martínez, Francisca; Barri, Pedro Nolasco; Veiga, Anna.
Affiliation
  • Clua E; Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Roca-Feliu M; Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Tresánchez M; Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Latre L; Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Rodriguez I; Institut Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Martínez F; Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Barri PN; Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Veiga A; Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain.
Gynecol Endocrinol ; 36(4): 365-369, 2020 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31464145
ABSTRACT
In IVF/ICSI programs, after receiving the information about the success results of single embryo transfer (SET) vs double embryo transfer (DET) and the risks of multiple pregnancy, a significant number of patients opt for SET. Up to date, no comparable studies have been published in oocyte recipients. The aim of this study was to evaluate if the counseling provided to oocyte recipients influence their decision on the number of embryos to be transferred. Fifty-five recipients expressed their preference and the relevance for the decision-making process that they attribute to certain factors through an anonymous questionnaire completed pre and post-counseling. Before counseling, 32 out of 55 recipients preferred DET, 13 preferred SET and 10 were undecided. From the 32 recipients who preferred DET, 16 (50%) maintained their preference after counseling, 13 (40.6%) changed their decision to SET and 3 (9.4%) changed to undecided (McNemar's test p < .05). After counseling, the patients attached less importance to the probability of pregnancy and more importance to maternal and perinatal risks (p < .05). We conclude that after counseling, a significant number of recipients changed their preferences from DET to SET.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Oocyte Donation / Decision Making / Embryo Transfer / Single Embryo Transfer / Patient Preference Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: Gynecol Endocrinol Journal subject: ENDOCRINOLOGIA / GINECOLOGIA Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Spain

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Oocyte Donation / Decision Making / Embryo Transfer / Single Embryo Transfer / Patient Preference Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: Gynecol Endocrinol Journal subject: ENDOCRINOLOGIA / GINECOLOGIA Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Spain
...