Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of the Different Mechanical Mitral Valve Sounds on the Patients' Quality of Life.
Huang, Jiang-Shan; Hong, Zhi-Nuan; Sun, Kai-Peng; Cao, Hua; Chen, Qiang.
Affiliation
  • Huang JS; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
  • Hong ZN; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
  • Sun KP; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
  • Cao H; Department of Cardiac Surgery, Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
  • Chen Q; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 68(6): 492-497, 2020 09.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31491792
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the opening and closing sounds of three different mechanical mitral valves and to analyze their effects on the quality of life of patients. METHODS: Ninety patients who underwent mechanical mitral valve replacement (MVR) were divided into three groups: those who received Advancing the Standard (ATS), St. Jude Medical (SJM), or Carbomedics (CM) mechanical valves. The sound pressure of the different valves was measured with a microphone. A detailed, self-designed questionnaire with a 1 to 10 analog scale and the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) score was used to assess the quality of life of the patients. RESULT: The sound pressure measured by ATS was 64.4 ± 3.1 dB, while that measured by SJM, and CM was 64.5 ± 4.7 and 67.2 ± 5.3 dB, respectively. The overall subjective interference score in the ATS group was the lowest compared with that in the SJM and CM groups (ATS: 1.3 ± 0.9 dB, SJM: 3.9 ± 1.6 dB, CM: 4.1 ± 1.5 dB). Relatives and nonfamily members of the ATS group also had the lowest analog scale scores. Specific questions showed that the ATS valve had the least impact on sleep and daily life (impact on sleep: ATS: 4/30, SJM: 9/30, CM: 11/30, impact on daily life: ATS: 2/30, SJM: 8/30, CM: 8/30). The SF-36 score showed that there were significant differences in social functioning, role-emotional, mental health, and vitality. CONCLUSION: Patients receiving ATS mechanical MVR may be less disturbed by valve noise than those receiving SJM or CM mechanical MVR in a single Chinese cardiac center.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Quality of Life / Auditory Perception / Heart Valve Prosthesis / Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation / Mitral Valve Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Year: 2020 Document type: Article Country of publication: Germany

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Quality of Life / Auditory Perception / Heart Valve Prosthesis / Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation / Mitral Valve Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Year: 2020 Document type: Article Country of publication: Germany