Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of Cuff Pressure on Blood Flow during Blood Flow-restricted Rest and Exercise.
Crossley, Kent W; Porter, Doran A; Ellsworth, Joshua; Caldwell, Tabitha; Feland, J Brent; Mitchell, Ulrike; Johnson, A Wayne; Egget, Dennis; Gifford, Jayson R.
Affiliation
  • Crossley KW; Department of Exercise Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.
  • Porter DA; Department of Exercise Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.
  • Ellsworth J; Department of Exercise Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.
  • Caldwell T; Department of Exercise Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.
  • Egget D; Department of Statistics, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.
Med Sci Sports Exerc ; 52(3): 746-753, 2020 03.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31568024
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This study investigated the relationship between blood flow restriction (BFR) cuff pressure and blood flow at rest and during exercise, with the aim of determining if lower cuff pressures will provide an ischemic stimulus comparable to higher pressures.

METHODS:

The relationship between blood flow and cuff pressure at rest was determined by measuring blood flow (Doppler Ultrasound) through the superficial femoral artery (SFA) in 23 adults across a range of pressures (0%-100% Arterial Occlusion Pressure at rest [rAOP]). The interplay between cuff pressure, blood flow and exercise was assessed by determining AOP at rest and during plantar flexion exercise (eAOP) and subsequently measuring the blood flow response to plantar flexion exercise with BFR cuff pressure set to either 40% rAOP or 40% eAOP.

RESULTS:

At rest, a nonlinear relationship between cuff pressure and blood flow through the SFA exhibited a plateau at moderate pressures, with nonsignificant differences in blood flow (~9%, P = 1.0) appearing between pressures ranging from 40% to 80% rAOP. While eAOP was greater than rAOP (229 ± 1.5 mm Hg vs 202 ± 1.5 mm Hg, P < 0.01), blood flow during plantar flexion exercise did not significantly differ (P = 0.49) when applying 40% rAOP or 40% eAOP.

CONCLUSIONS:

Blood flow through the SFA exhibits a nonlinear relationship with cuff pressure, such that cuff pressures in the range of 40% to 80% rAOP reduce blood flow to approximately the same degree. The BFR interventions opting for lower (e.g., 40% AOP), more comfortable pressures will likely provide an ischemic stimulus comparable to that of higher (80% AOP), less-comfortable pressures.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Regional Blood Flow / Blood Pressure / Exercise / Femoral Artery / Physical Conditioning, Human Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Year: 2020 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Regional Blood Flow / Blood Pressure / Exercise / Femoral Artery / Physical Conditioning, Human Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Year: 2020 Document type: Article