Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The cost of illness and economic burden of endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain in Australia: A national online survey.
Armour, Mike; Lawson, Kenny; Wood, Aidan; Smith, Caroline A; Abbott, Jason.
Affiliation
  • Armour M; NICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Lawson K; Translational Health Research Institute (THRI), Western Sydney University, Sydney New South Wales, Australia.
  • Wood A; Translational Health Research Institute (THRI), Western Sydney University, Sydney New South Wales, Australia.
  • Smith CA; NICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Abbott J; Translational Health Research Institute (THRI), Western Sydney University, Sydney New South Wales, Australia.
PLoS One ; 14(10): e0223316, 2019.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31600241
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Endometriosis has a significant cost of illness burden in Europe, UK and the USA, with the majority of costs coming from reductions in productivity. However, information is scarce on if there is a differing impact between endometriosis and other causes of chronic pelvic pain, and if there are modifiable factors, such as pain severity, that may be significant contributors to the overall burden.

METHODS:

An online survey was hosted by SurveyMonkey and the link was active between February to April 2017. Women aged 18-45, currently living in Australia, who had either a confirmed diagnosis of endometriosis via laparoscopy or chronic pelvic pain without a diagnosis of endometriosis were included. The retrospective component of the WERF EndoCost tool was used to determine direct healthcare costs, direct non-healthcare costs (carers) and indirect costs due to productivity loss. Estimates were extrapolated to the Australian population using published prevalence estimates.

RESULTS:

407 valid responses were received. The cost of illness burden was significant in women with chronic pelvic pain (Int $16,970 to $ 20,898 per woman per year) irrespective of whether they had a diagnosis of endometriosis. The majority of costs (75-84%) were due to productivity loss. Both absolute and relative productivity costs in Australia were higher than previous estimates based on data from Europe, UK and USA. Pain scores showed the strongest relationship to productivity costs, a 12.5-fold increase in costs between minimal to severe pain. The total economic burden per year in Australia in the reproductive aged population (at 10% prevalence) was 6.50 billion Int $.

CONCLUSION:

Similar to studies in European, British and American populations, productivity costs are the greatest contributor to overall costs. Given pain is the most significant contributor, priority should be given to improving pain control in women with pelvic pain.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Surveys and Questionnaires / Cost of Illness / Pelvic Pain / Internet / Endometriosis / Chronic Pain Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Surveys and Questionnaires / Cost of Illness / Pelvic Pain / Internet / Endometriosis / Chronic Pain Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia