Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Recovery priorities in degenerative cervical myelopathy: a cross-sectional survey of an international, online community of patients.
Davies, Benjamin; Mowforth, Oliver; Sadler, Iwan; Aarabi, Bizhan; Kwon, Brian; Kurpad, Shekar; Harrop, James S; Wilson, Jefferson R; Grossman, Robert; Fehlings, Michael G; Kotter, Mark.
Affiliation
  • Davies B; Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  • Mowforth O; Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  • Sadler I; Myelopathy.org, Cambridge, UK.
  • Aarabi B; Division of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Kwon B; Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, UK.
  • Kurpad S; Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Harrop JS; Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Wilson JR; Department of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, UK.
  • Grossman R; Department of Neurosurgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Fehlings MG; Department of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, UK.
  • Kotter M; Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK mrk25@cam.ac.uk.
BMJ Open ; 9(10): e031486, 2019 10 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31601597
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To establish the recovery priorities of individuals suffering with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM).

DESIGN:

A cross-sectional, observational study.

SETTING:

Patients from across the world with a diagnosis of DCM accessed the survey over an 18-month period on Myelopathy.org, an international myelopathy charity.

PARTICIPANTS:

481 individuals suffering from DCM completed the online survey fully. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Functional recovery domains were established through qualitative interviews and a consensus process. Individuals were asked about their disease characteristics, including limb pain (Visual Analogue Scale) and functional disability (patient-derived version of the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score). Individuals ranked recovery domains (arm and hand function, walking, upper body/trunk function, sexual function, elimination of pain, sensation and bladder/bowel function) in order of priority. Priorities were analysed as the modal first priority and mean ranking. The influence of demographics on selection was analysed, with significance p<0.05.

RESULTS:

Of 659 survey responses obtained, 481 were complete. Overall, pain was the most popular recovery priority (39.9%) of respondents, followed by walking (20.2%), sensation (11.9%) and arm and hand function (11.5%). Sexual function (5.7%), bladder and bowel (3.7%) and trunk function (3.5%) were chosen less frequently. When considering the average ranking of symptoms, while pain remained the priority (2.6±2.0), this was closely followed by walking (2.9±1.7) and arm/hand function (3.0±1.4). Sensation ranked lower (4.3±2.1). With respect to disease characteristics, overall pain remained the recovery priority, with the exception of patients with greater walking impairment (p<0.005) who prioritised walking, even among patients with lower pain scores.

CONCLUSIONS:

This is the first study investigating patient priorities in DCM. The patient priorities reported provide an important framework for future research and will help to ensure that it is aligned with patient needs.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Spinal Cord Diseases Type of study: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Spinal Cord Diseases Type of study: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom