Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Flipped learning: Turning medical education upside down.
Chowdhury, Tahseen A; Khan, Halima; Druce, Maralyn R; Drake, William M; Rajakariar, Ravindra; Thuraisingham, Raj; Dobbie, Hamish; Parvanta, Laila; Chinegwundoh, Francis; Almushatat, Ahmad; Warrens, Anthony; Alstead, Elspeth M.
Affiliation
  • Chowdhury TA; Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.
  • Khan H; Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.
  • Druce MR; Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.
  • Drake WM; Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.
  • Rajakariar R; Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.
  • Thuraisingham R; Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.
  • Dobbie H; Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.
  • Parvanta L; Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.
  • Chinegwundoh F; Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.
  • Almushatat A; Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.
  • Warrens A; Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.
  • Alstead EM; Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.
Future Healthc J ; 6(3): 192-195, 2019 Oct.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31660525
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Flipped learning is an approach in which core teaching is delivered using online material viewed prior to face-to-face learning, applying knowledge gained from online material. Core teaching in a module for third-year undergraduate medical students was based around a 1-week course comprising 32 hours of lectures. Feedback suggested that students were poorly engaged and attendance was poor.

OBJECTIVES:

To develop and evaluate a programme of learning for medical students using flipped learning.

METHODS:

Core lectures were videoed and students were advised to watch online at home in the morning prior to a case-based interactive discussion session in the afternoon. Feedback was undertaken prior to and following change in delivery; changes in Likert scale feedback were assessed. Thematic assessment of free-text feedback was undertaken. Results of in-course assessment examinations were compared prior to and following change in delivery.

RESULTS:

Student feedback showed a significant improvement in satisfaction with flipped learning compared to standard lectures, both in scores and free-text feedback. Results of in-course assessments did not change between the two methods of delivery.

CONCLUSIONS:

Flipped learning can improve student satisfaction and engagement with teaching, but our study has not demonstrated an improvement in assessment scores.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Qualitative_research Language: En Journal: Future Healthc J Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Qualitative_research Language: En Journal: Future Healthc J Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom