Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Beam modeling and beam model commissioning for Monte Carlo dose calculation-based radiation therapy treatment planning: Report of AAPM Task Group 157.
Ma, Chang Ming Charlie; Chetty, Indrin J; Deng, Jun; Faddegon, Bruce; Jiang, Steve B; Li, Jinsheng; Seuntjens, Jan; Siebers, Jeffrey V; Traneus, Erik.
Affiliation
  • Ma CMC; Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA.
  • Chetty IJ; Radiation Oncology Department, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, 48188, USA.
  • Deng J; Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06032, USA.
  • Faddegon B; Department of Radiation Oncology, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
  • Jiang SB; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
  • Li J; OUR United RT Group, Xian, 710018, China.
  • Seuntjens J; Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.
  • Siebers JV; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA.
  • Traneus E; RaySearch Laboratories AB, SE-103 65, Stockholm, Sweden.
Med Phys ; 47(1): e1-e18, 2020 Jan.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31679157
ABSTRACT
Dose calculation plays an important role in the accuracy of radiotherapy treatment planning and beam delivery. The Monte Carlo (MC) method is capable of achieving the highest accuracy in radiotherapy dose calculation and has been implemented in many commercial systems for radiotherapy treatment planning. The objective of this task group was to assist clinical physicists with the potentially complex task of acceptance testing and commissioning MC-based treatment planning systems (TPS) for photon and electron beam dose calculations. This report provides an overview on the general approach of clinical implementation and testing of MC-based TPS with a specific focus on models of clinical photon and electron beams. Different types of beam models are described including those that utilize MC simulation of the treatment head and those that rely on analytical methods and measurements. The trade-off between accuracy and efficiency in the various source-modeling approaches is discussed together with guidelines for acceptance testing of MC-based TPS from the clinical standpoint. Specific recommendations are given on methods and practical procedures to commission clinical beam models for MC-based TPS.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiation Dosage / Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted / Monte Carlo Method / Research Report / Models, Theoretical Type of study: Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation Language: En Journal: Med Phys Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiation Dosage / Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted / Monte Carlo Method / Research Report / Models, Theoretical Type of study: Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation Language: En Journal: Med Phys Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States
...