Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
18FDG PET/CT in the early assessment of non-small cell lung cancer response to immunotherapy: frequency and clinical significance of atypical evolutive patterns.
Humbert, O; Cadour, N; Paquet, M; Schiappa, R; Poudenx, M; Chardin, D; Borchiellini, D; Benisvy, D; Ouvrier, M J; Zwarthoed, C; Schiazza, A; Ilie, M; Ghalloussi, H; Koulibaly, P M; Darcourt, J; Otto, J.
Affiliation
  • Humbert O; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur (UCA), 33 Avenue de Valombrose, 06189, Nice, France. olivier.humbert@univ-cotedazur.fr.
  • Cadour N; Laboratory Transporter in Imaging and Radiotherapy in Oncology (TIRO), UMR E 4320, CEA, UCA, Nice, France. olivier.humbert@univ-cotedazur.fr.
  • Paquet M; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur (UCA), 33 Avenue de Valombrose, 06189, Nice, France.
  • Schiappa R; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur (UCA), 33 Avenue de Valombrose, 06189, Nice, France.
  • Poudenx M; Department of Biostatistics, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, UCA, Nice, France.
  • Chardin D; Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, UCA, Nice, France.
  • Borchiellini D; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur (UCA), 33 Avenue de Valombrose, 06189, Nice, France.
  • Benisvy D; Laboratory Transporter in Imaging and Radiotherapy in Oncology (TIRO), UMR E 4320, CEA, UCA, Nice, France.
  • Ouvrier MJ; Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, UCA, Nice, France.
  • Zwarthoed C; Clinical Research and Innovation Office, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, UCA, Nice, France.
  • Schiazza A; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur (UCA), 33 Avenue de Valombrose, 06189, Nice, France.
  • Ilie M; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur (UCA), 33 Avenue de Valombrose, 06189, Nice, France.
  • Ghalloussi H; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur (UCA), 33 Avenue de Valombrose, 06189, Nice, France.
  • Koulibaly PM; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur (UCA), 33 Avenue de Valombrose, 06189, Nice, France.
  • Darcourt J; Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Hospital-Integrated Biobank (BB-0033-00025), Nice Hospital University, FHU OncoAge, UCA, Nice, France.
  • Otto J; Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, UCA, Nice, France.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ; 47(5): 1158-1167, 2020 05.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31760467
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This prospective study aimed (1) to assess the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) evolutive patterns to immunotherapy using FDG-PET and (2) to describe their association with clinical outcome.

DESIGN:

Fifty patients with metastatic NSCLC were included before pembrolizumab or nivolumab initiation. FDG-PET scan was performed at baseline and after 7 weeks of treatment (PETinterim1) and different criteria/parameters of tumor response were assessed, including PET response criteria in solid tumors (PERCIST). If a first PERCIST progressive disease (PD) without clinical worsening was observed, treatment was continued and a subsequent FDG-PET (PETinterim2) was performed at 3 months of treatment. Pseudo-progression (PsPD) was defined as a PERCIST response/stability on PETinterim2 after an initial PD. If a second PERCIST PD was assessed on PETinterim2, a homogeneous progression of lesions (termed immune homogeneous progressive-disease iPDhomogeneous) was distinguished from a heterogeneous evolution (termed immune dissociated-response iDR). A durable clinical benefit (DCB) of immunotherapy was defined as treatment continuation over a 6-month period. The association between PET evolutive profiles and DCB was assessed.

RESULTS:

Using PERCIST on PETinterim1, 42% (21/50) of patients showed a response or stable disease, most of them (18/21) reached a DCB. In contrast, 58% (29/50) showed a PD, but more than one-third (11/29) were misclassified as they finally reached a DCB. No standard PETinterim1 criteria could accurately distinguished responding from non-responding patients. Treatment was continued in 19/29 of patients with a first PERCIST PD; the subsequent PETinterim2 demonstrated iPDhomogeneous, iDR and PsPD in 42% (8/19), 26% (5/19), and 32% (6/19), respectively. Whereas no patients with iPDhomogeneous experienced a DCB, all patients with iDR and PsPD reached a clinical benefit to immunotherapy.

CONCLUSION:

In patients with a first PD on PERCIST and treatment continuation, a subsequent PET identifies more than half of them with iDR and PsPD, both patterns being strongly associated with a clinical benefit of immunotherapy.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / Lung Neoplasms Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Journal subject: MEDICINA NUCLEAR Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: France

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / Lung Neoplasms Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Journal subject: MEDICINA NUCLEAR Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: France