Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
SO2 Emission Estimates Using OMI SO2 Retrievals for 2005-2017.
Qu, Zhen; Henze, Daven K; Li, Can; Theys, Nicolas; Wang, Yi; Wang, Jun; Wang, Wei; Han, Jihyun; Shim, Changsub; Dickerson, Russell R; Ren, Xinrong.
Affiliation
  • Qu Z; Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Colorado Boulder Boulder CO USA.
  • Henze DK; Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Colorado Boulder Boulder CO USA.
  • Li C; NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt MD USA.
  • Theys N; Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center University of Maryland College Park MD USA.
  • Wang Y; Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (BIRA-IASB) Brussels Belgium.
  • Wang J; Center for Global and Regional Environmental Research, Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering University of Iowa Iowa City IA USA.
  • Wang W; Center for Global and Regional Environmental Research, Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering University of Iowa Iowa City IA USA.
  • Han J; China National Environmental Monitoring Center Beijing China.
  • Shim C; Korea Environment Institute Sejong South Korea.
  • Dickerson RR; Korea Environment Institute Sejong South Korea.
  • Ren X; Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science University of Maryland College Park MD USA.
J Geophys Res Atmos ; 124(14): 8336-8359, 2019 Jul 27.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31763109
ABSTRACT
SO2 column densities from Ozone Monitoring Instrument provide important information on emission trends and missing sources, but there are discrepancies between different retrieval products. We employ three Ozone Monitoring Instrument SO2 retrieval products (National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) standard (SP), NASA prototype, and BIRA) to study the magnitude and trend of SO2 emissions. SO2 column densities from these retrievals are most consistent when viewing angles and solar zenith angles are small, suggesting more robust emission estimates in summer and at low latitudes. We then apply a hybrid 4D-Var/mass balance emission inversion to derive monthly SO2 emissions from the NASA SP and BIRA products. Compared to HTAPv2 emissions in 2010, both posterior emission estimates are lower in United States, India, and Southeast China, but show different changes of emissions in North China Plain. The discrepancies between monthly NASA and BIRA posterior emissions in 2010 are less than or equal to 17% in China and 34% in India. SO2 emissions increase from 2005 to 2016 by 35% (NASA)-48% (BIRA) in India, but decrease in China by 23% (NASA)-33% (BIRA) since 2008. Compared to in situ measurements, the posterior GEOS-Chem surface SO2 concentrations have reduced NMB in China, the United States, and India but not in South Korea in 2010. BIRA posteriors have better consistency with the annual growth rate of surface SO2 measurement in China and spatial variability of SO2 concentration in China, South Korea, and India, whereas NASA SP posteriors have better seasonality. These evaluations demonstrate the capability to recover SO2 emissions using Ozone Monitoring Instrument observations.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Geophys Res Atmos Year: 2019 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Geophys Res Atmos Year: 2019 Document type: Article
...