Assessment of intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with moderate traumatic brain injury: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring has now been a standard technique for the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI), while the effect of ICP monitoring for moderate traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is not clear. Moreover, evidence comparing the two types of ICP monitoring: ventricular drainage (VD) catheter and intraparenchymal (IP) catheter is scarce. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 91 patients with mTBI were reviewed retrospectively. They were divided into VD, IP and Non-ICP group. Baseline parameters were recorded. The clinical outcome was reflected by Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) and mortality at discharge and six months after injury. The rate of surgical decompression, refractory intracranial hypertension, neuroworsening, dose of mannitol and cranial CT were recorded. Meningitis and intracranial hematoma, two major complications of ICP monitoring, were also collected. RESULTS: the three groups showed no significant difference in GOS at discharge and six months after injury. The mortality was similar among the three groups at six months after injury, while the Non-ICP group had the highest mortality at discharge. The Non-ICP group was administered the most mannitol while the VD group was administered the least. The Non-ICP group also received the most cranial CT scans among the three groups. Incidence of meningitis and intracranial hematoma were not significantly different among the VD and IP group. CONCLUSION: use of ICP monitoring could hardly improve the functional outcome of mTBI, but may possibly reduce the in-hospital mortality. By using ICP monitoring, the dose of mannitol and cranial CT scan for mTBI patients may be decreased.