Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Analysis of documented informed consent forms for computed tomography : Completeness and data quality in four clinics]. / Analyse von dokumentierten Computertomographie-Aufklärungen : Vollständigkeit und Datenqualität in vier Kliniken.
Vogele, D; Schöffski, O; Efinger, K; Schmidt, S A; Beer, M; Kildal, D.
Affiliation
  • Vogele D; Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Deutschland. daniel.vogele@uniklinik-ulm.de.
  • Schöffski O; Lehrstuhl für Gesundheitsmanagement, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Deutschland.
  • Efinger K; Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Ulm, Ulm, Deutschland.
  • Schmidt SA; Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Deutschland.
  • Beer M; Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Deutschland.
  • Kildal D; Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Deutschland.
Radiologe ; 60(2): 162-168, 2020 Feb.
Article in De | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31858158
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Before performing a medical procedure, such as a computed tomography, an obligatory informed consent of the patient and its detailed documentation is necessary.

METHODS:

A total of 1424 informed consent forms for contrast-enhanced computed tomography from four clinics with different healthcare levels were analyzed. Informed consent forms were evaluated related to completeness, legibility and quality.

RESULTS:

In all, 1110 (77.9%) informed consent forms were sufficiently completed, 267 patients (18.8%) answered the form incompletely and 47 patients (3.3%) returned it without answering a question. Handwritten comments were found in 1391 (97.7%) cases. Thereof, 1329 (93.3%) were graded as detailed comments and 62 (4.4%) as less detailed comments. These comments were well legible in 675 (47.4%) cases, 558 (39.2%) informed consents showed limited legibility and in 158 (11.1%) more than 50% of the comments were unreadable. Signatures were complete in 1374 (96.5%) informed consent forms.

CONCLUSION:

The results show a better quality and documentation of informed consent forms for computed tomography obtained by radiology residents compared to radiological specialists. Compared to the radiologists, the non-radiologists performed significantly worse. The establishment of videos and use of digital informed consent forms could provide a possible solution.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Tomography, X-Ray / Consent Forms / Data Accuracy Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: De Journal: Radiologe Year: 2020 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Tomography, X-Ray / Consent Forms / Data Accuracy Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: De Journal: Radiologe Year: 2020 Document type: Article