Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of international normalized ratio determined by point-of-care to standard laboratory testing before and after reversal of heparin in cardiac surgery.
Fabbro, Michael; Abalo, Miguel; Fermin, Lilibeth; Andrews, David M; Patel, Prakash A.
Affiliation
  • Fabbro M; Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Management, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami.
  • Abalo M; Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Management, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami.
  • Fermin L; Department of General Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic, Weston.
  • Andrews DM; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
  • Patel PA; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis ; 31(2): 140-144, 2020 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31934886
ABSTRACT
STUDY

OBJECTIVE:

To compare point-of-care (POC) of international normalized ratio to laboratory-derived values before and after cardiopulmonary bypass, with the primary aim of evaluating for any change in the relationship between the tests.

METHODS:

This is a prospective observational study with 50 patients undergoing cardiac surgery enrolled. The International normalized ratio measured at two time points, precardiopulmonary bypass and after heparin reversal with protamine using both POC i-STAT and standard laboratory analysis for both time points. A difference of 0.2 between tests at either time point was considered clinically significant based on previous literature. A paired t test was used to test for a changing or statistically significant mean difference between tests. At both time points values were categorized into absolute difference of more than 0.2 or less than 0.2, and a Fisher's exact test was used to determine if an association existed between heparin reversal and a difference more than 0.2. Bland-Altman plots were also evaluated for agreement.

RESULTS:

A statistically and clinically significant mean difference [0.09 vs. 0.25, difference -0.163 95% confidence interval (-0.25, -0.08), P = 0.003] was seen between the laboratory and POC tests when pre and postheparin reversal samples were compared. A significantly greater number of patients had a clinically relevant difference between the tests post compared with pre (four patients vs. 18 patients, P = 0.001). Linear regression analysis of the difference compared with the means, showed significant correlation suggesting the presence of a proportional bias (pre r = 0.488, P = <0.01, post r = 0.571, P = <0.01).

CONCLUSION:

Clinically significant differences exist between POC and laboratory testing of international normalized ratio after heparin reversal during cardiac surgery. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03267823.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Point-of-Care Systems / Clinical Laboratory Techniques / International Normalized Ratio / Cardiac Surgical Procedures / Heparin Antagonists Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis Journal subject: ANGIOLOGIA / HEMATOLOGIA Year: 2020 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Point-of-Care Systems / Clinical Laboratory Techniques / International Normalized Ratio / Cardiac Surgical Procedures / Heparin Antagonists Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis Journal subject: ANGIOLOGIA / HEMATOLOGIA Year: 2020 Document type: Article