Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
WHO guide to good prescribing is 25 years old: quo vadis?
Tichelaar, J; Richir, M C; Garner, S; Hogerzeil, H; de Vries, Th P G M.
Affiliation
  • Tichelaar J; Research and Expertise Center In Pharmacotherapy Education (RECIPE), Amsterdam, the Netherlands. j.tichelaar@amsterdamumc.nl.
  • Richir MC; Department of Internal Medicine, Section Pharmacotherapy, Amsterdam UMC, location VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117 (ZH 4A48), 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. j.tichelaar@amsterdamumc.nl.
  • Garner S; Research and Expertise Center In Pharmacotherapy Education (RECIPE), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Hogerzeil H; Department of Internal Medicine, Section Pharmacotherapy, Amsterdam UMC, location VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117 (ZH 4A48), 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • de Vries TPGM; WHO, Health Technologies and Pharmaceuticals Programme, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 76(4): 507-513, 2020 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31938856
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Twenty-five years ago, the World Health Organization (WHO) published the Guide to Good Prescribing (GGP), followed by the accompanying Teacher's Guide to Good Prescribing (TGGP). The GGP is based on a normative 6-step model for therapeutic reasoning and prescribing, and provides a six-step guide for students to the process of rational prescribing.

METHOD:

We reviewed the need to update both WHO publications by evaluating their use and impact, including new (theoretical) insights and demands. Based on information from literature, Internet, and other (personal) sources, we draw the following conclusions.

RESULTS:

1. An update of the GGP and TGGP, both in terms of content and form, is necessary because of the current need for these tools (irrational medicine use and unavailability of medicines), the lack of similar documents, and the lack of connection with recent developments, such as Internet and modern education; 2. The basic (6-step) model of the GGP is effective in terms of rational prescribing in the undergraduate situation and is still consistent with current theories about (context) learning, clinical decision-making, and clinical practice; 3. The dissemination and introduction of the GGP and TGGP in education has been successful so far, but is still not optimal because of lack of support and cooperation.

CONCLUSIONS:

On the basis of the evaluation results, a plan for the revision of the GGP and TGGP is presented.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pharmacology, Clinical / Drug Prescriptions / Practice Guidelines as Topic / Education, Medical Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pharmacology, Clinical / Drug Prescriptions / Practice Guidelines as Topic / Education, Medical Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands
...