Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety of Custodiol cardioplegia: a cohort study in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with elongated aortic cross-clamp time.
de Haan, Maarten; van Straten, Albert; Overdevest, Ed; de Jong, Michel; Soliman-Hamad, Mohamed.
Affiliation
  • de Haan M; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
  • van Straten A; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
  • Overdevest E; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
  • de Jong M; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Soliman-Hamad M; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Perfusion ; 35(7): 591-597, 2020 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31948381
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/

OBJECTIVES:

The increasing complexity of patients undergoing cardiac surgery requires extended myocardial ischaemic periods. Cardiac surgeons demand a cardioplegic solution with prolonged myocardial protection. Therefore, we introduced Custodiol in our centre in 2011. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of Custodiol compared with the standard method of cardioplegia.

METHODS:

Between 2011 and 2016, 188 adult patients who underwent mitral valve surgery combined with coronary artery bypass grafting were included in this retrospective study. In 113 patients, Custodiol cardioplegia was used to achieve cardiac arrest, while St. Thomas Hospital solution was used in 75 patients. The primary endpoint of the study was the degree myocardial damage which was estimated by the measurement of creatine kinase-myocardial band on the first postoperative day. A linear regression analysis was performed to compare the aortic cross-clamp time with the postoperative myocardial damage in both groups.

RESULTS:

The extracorporeal circulation time and aortic cross-clamp were significantly longer in the Custodiol group than in the St. Thomas group 125.6 ± 32.5 minutes versus 93.1 ± 27.7 minutes (p < 0.001), respectively. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the postoperative levels of creatine kinase-myocardial band (96 (70-140) U/L vs. 86 (69-120) U/L, respectively; p = 0.321). There was no significant differences between the two groups regarding the 30-day mortality (6.1% vs. 5.5%, respectively; p = 1.000) or 120-day mortality (9.6% vs. 11.0%, respectively; p = 0.806).

CONCLUSION:

Our findings demonstrate that Custodiol is a safe method of myocardial protection for patients who underwent mitral valve surgery with coronary artery bypass grafting in our hospital. Further investigations extended to more cardiac surgery populations are needed to confirm clinical benefits of Custodiol cardioplegia.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Aorta / Heart Arrest, Induced / Cardiac Surgical Procedures Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Perfusion Journal subject: CARDIOLOGIA Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Aorta / Heart Arrest, Induced / Cardiac Surgical Procedures Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Perfusion Journal subject: CARDIOLOGIA Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands