Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Simulation training for the endoscopic management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a nationwide survey of rural surgeons' needs and preferences analysis.
Purnell, Shawn M; Vargo, Daniel J; Sarap, Michael; Nguyen-Lee, John J; Allen, Chelsea; Dunkin, Brian J.
Affiliation
  • Purnell SM; Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, 6550 Fannin Street, Smith Tower 1661, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. smpurnell@houstonmethodist.org.
  • Vargo DJ; Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA. smpurnell@houstonmethodist.org.
  • Sarap M; Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
  • Nguyen-Lee JJ; Southeastern Ohio Regional Medical Center, Cambridge, USA.
  • Allen C; Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, 6550 Fannin Street, Smith Tower 1661, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
  • Dunkin BJ; Center for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
Surg Endosc ; 35(1): 333-339, 2021 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32030550
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Published needs analyses of rural surgeons have identified a need for training in the endoscopic management of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB). The study aim was to survey rural surgeons regarding their requirements and preferences for a simulation model on which they could rehearse the endoscopic management of NVUGIB.

METHODS:

Rural surgeons were contacted via the American College of Surgery Advisory Council listserv and invited to complete an online survey.

RESULTS:

A total of 66 responses were received, representing all 4 US regional divisions. Seventy-seven percent of respondents perform > 100 endoscopy cases per year. A majority have no experience with simulation models (77%), citing cost, time, and access to training courses as the three most limiting factors. Thirty-three percent lacked confidence in managing UGIBs, and 73% were interested in receiving additional training. Preference analysis revealed that respondents preferred a portable simulation model (81%) that costs between $500 and $1000 (46%), and requires 1-2 weeks of training (34%). Verbal feedback from an expert was viewed as the most helpful type of feedback (61%).

CONCLUSION:

Rural surgeons frequently perform flexible endoscopy in their practice and are interested in further training for the endoscopic management of NVUGIB. These results will be used to develop a simulation platform for training in the endoscopic management of NVUGIB that meets rural surgeons' needs.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Endoscopy / Simulation Training / Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Surg Endosc Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Endoscopy / Simulation Training / Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Surg Endosc Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States