Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical relevance of marginal factors on ultrafiltration in peritoneal dialysis.
Pérez-Díaz, Vicente; Pérez-Escudero, Alfonso; Sanz-Ballesteros, Sandra; Sánchez-García, Luisa; Hernández-García, Esther; Oviedo-Gómez, Victoria; Sobrino-Pérez, Alicia.
Affiliation
  • Pérez-Díaz V; Servicio de Nefrología, 16238Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Spain.
  • Pérez-Escudero A; Department of Medicine, Dermatology and Toxicology, Universidad de Valladolid, Spain.
  • Sanz-Ballesteros S; Research Center on Animal Cognition (CRCA), Center for Integrative Biology (CBI), Toulouse University, CNRS, UPS, France.
  • Sánchez-García L; Servicio de Nefrología, 16238Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Spain.
  • Hernández-García E; Department of Medicine, Dermatology and Toxicology, Universidad de Valladolid, Spain.
  • Oviedo-Gómez V; Servicio de Nefrología, 16918Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega de Valladolid, Spain.
  • Sobrino-Pérez A; Servicio de Nefrología, 70701Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Palencia, Spain.
Perit Dial Int ; 41(1): 86-95, 2021 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32048915
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Ultrafiltration (UF) in peritoneal dialysis (PD) is mainly driven by the osmotic gradient and peritoneal permeability, but other factors-such as intraperitoneal pressure (IPP)-also have an influence.

METHODS:

To assess the clinical relevance of these marginal factors, we studied 41 unselected PD patients undergoing two consecutive 2 h, 2.27% glucose exchanges, first with 2.5 L and then with 1.5 L.

RESULTS:

IPP, higher in the 2.5 L exchange, had a wide interpatient range, was higher in obese and polycystic patients and their increase with infusion volume was higher for women regardless of body size. UF with 2.5 L correlated inversely with IPP and was higher for patients with polycystosis or hernias, while for 1.5 L we found no significant correlations. The effluent had higher glucose and osmolarity in the 2.5 L exchange than in the 1.5 L one, similar for both sexes. In spite of this stronger osmotic gradient, only 21 patients had more UF in the 2.5 L exchange, with differences up to 240 mL. The other 20 patients had more UF in the 1.5 L exchange, with stronger differences (up to 800 mL, and more than 240 mL for 9 patients). The second group, with similar effluent osmolarity and peritoneal equilibration test (PET) parameters than the first, has higher IPP and preponderance of men. The sex influence is so intense that men decreased average UF with 2.5 L with respect to 1.5 L, while women increased it.

CONCLUSIONS:

With 2.27% glucose, sex and IPP-modulated by obesity, polycystosis, hernias, and intraperitoneal volume-significantly affect UF in clinical settings and might be useful for its management.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ultrafiltration / Peritoneal Dialysis Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Perit Dial Int Journal subject: NEFROLOGIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Spain

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ultrafiltration / Peritoneal Dialysis Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Perit Dial Int Journal subject: NEFROLOGIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Spain
...