Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Survey of Exercise Prescription in US Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programs.
Garvey, Chris; Casaburi, Richard; Spruit, Martijn A; De Brandt, Jana.
Affiliation
  • Garvey C; Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco (Mr Garvey); Rehabilitation Clinical Trials Center, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California (Dr Casaburi); REVAL-Rehabilitation Research Center, BIOMED-Biomedical Research Institute, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium (Dr Spruit and Ms De Brandt); Department of Research and Education, CIRO+, Center of Expertise for Chronic O
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev ; 40(2): 116-119, 2020 03.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32118657
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is the standard of care for chronic, symptomatic lung disease. Current scientific and clinical guidelines recommend PR to improve dyspnea, functional capacity, and quality of life. Several PR guidelines provide recommendations about the mode, intensity, duration, frequency, and progression of exercise-based interventions. There are variations in the components of PR exercise prescription that may influence the response to PR, as well as variations in how the exercise prescription and its components are determined and monitored. Therefore, the purpose of this investigation was to identify current PR exercise prescription practices via survey sent to 1758 PR programs in the United States.

METHODS:

The American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation administered surveys in 2013 and 2016 to US-based PR providers.

RESULTS:

Responses were returned from 371 PR providers (vs 380 in 2013). There was an increase in responses for all options describing exercise prescription methodology in the 2016 survey, with each element (frequency, intensity, time [duration], and type [mode]; FITT) demonstrating significant increase in use. There was a significant increase in 3 methods of determining exercise goals in 2016 versus 2013 duration (P = .017), distance (P = .010), and metabolic equivalents of task (P ≤ .001).

CONCLUSIONS:

The 2016 survey responses show a greater use of guideline-based exercise prescription methodology, with an increase in use of FITT methodology for exercise prescription.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Health Care Surveys / Exercise Therapy / Lung Diseases Type of study: Guideline / Qualitative_research Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev Year: 2020 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Health Care Surveys / Exercise Therapy / Lung Diseases Type of study: Guideline / Qualitative_research Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev Year: 2020 Document type: Article
...