Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A systematic review of the Irish osteoporotic vertebral fracture literature.
McCabe, Eva; Ibrahim, Ammar; Singh, Rajneet; Kelly, Michael; Armstrong, Catherine; Heaney, Fiona; Bergin, Diane; McCabe, John P; Carey, John J.
Affiliation
  • McCabe E; School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland. eva.mccabe@nuigalway.ie.
  • Ibrahim A; Department of Rheumatology, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland. eva.mccabe@nuigalway.ie.
  • Singh R; School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
  • Kelly M; Department of Rheumatology, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland.
  • Armstrong C; School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
  • Heaney F; Department of Rheumatology, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland.
  • Bergin D; Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland.
  • McCabe JP; School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
  • Carey JJ; Department of Rheumatology, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland.
Arch Osteoporos ; 15(1): 34, 2020 03 02.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32124074
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Vertebral fractures (VF) are the most common osteoporotic fracture. They are associated with significant morbidity and mortality and are an important predictor of future fractures. The epidemiology of VF in Ireland is limited and a greater understanding of their scale and impact is needed. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review of publications on osteoporotic VF in Ireland.

METHODS:

Systematic searches were conducted using PubMed, Medline, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane electronic databases to identify eligible publications from Ireland addressing osteoporotic VF.

RESULTS:

Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria out of 1558 citations. All studies were published since 2000. Data was obtained on 182,771 patients with fractures. Nine studies included more than 100 subjects and three included more than 1000. Females accounted for 70% with an overall mean age of 65.2 years (30-94). There was significant heterogeneity in study design, methods and outcome measures including the following use of administrative claims data on public hospital admissions, surgical and medical interventions, the impact of a fracture liaison service and the osteoporosis economic burden. The prevalence of VF was difficult to ascertain due to definitions used and differences in the study populations. Only two studies systematically reviewed spine imaging using blinded assessors and validated diagnostic criteria to assess the prevalence of fractures in patient cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS:

Several studies show that VF are common when addressed systematically and the prevalence may be rising. However, there is a deficit of large studies systematically addressing the epidemiology and their importance in Ireland.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Spinal Fractures / Osteoporotic Fractures Type of study: Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Arch Osteoporos Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Ireland

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Spinal Fractures / Osteoporotic Fractures Type of study: Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Arch Osteoporos Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Ireland