Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of a fully automated liver segmentation algorithm using multi-scale deep reinforcement learning and comparison versus manual segmentation.
Winkel, David J; Weikert, Thomas J; Breit, Hanns-Christian; Chabin, Guillaume; Gibson, Eli; Heye, Tobias J; Comaniciu, Dorin; Boll, Daniel T.
Affiliation
  • Winkel DJ; Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Siemens Healthineers, Medical Imaging Technologies, Princeton, NJ, USA. Electronic address: davidjean.winkel@usb.ch.
  • Weikert TJ; Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Breit HC; Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Chabin G; Siemens Healthineers, Medical Imaging Technologies, Princeton, NJ, USA.
  • Gibson E; Siemens Healthineers, Medical Imaging Technologies, Princeton, NJ, USA.
  • Heye TJ; Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Comaniciu D; Siemens Healthineers, Medical Imaging Technologies, Princeton, NJ, USA.
  • Boll DT; Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Eur J Radiol ; 126: 108918, 2020 May.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32171914
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI) based software solution tested on liver volumetric analyses and to compare the results to the manual contour segmentation. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We retrospectively obtained 462 multiphasic CT datasets with six series for each patient three different contrast phases and two slice thickness reconstructions (1.5/5 mm), totaling 2772 series. AI-based liver volumes were determined using multi-scale deep-reinforcement learning for 3D body markers detection and 3D structure segmentation. The algorithm was trained for liver volumetry on approximately 5000 datasets. We computed the absolute error of each automatically- and manually-derived volume relative to the mean manual volume. The mean processing time/dataset and method was recorded. Variations of liver volumes were compared using univariate generalized linear model analyses. A subgroup of 60 datasets was manually segmented by three radiologists, with a further subgroup of 20 segmented three times by each, to compare the automatically-derived results with the ground-truth.

RESULTS:

The mean absolute error of the automatically-derived measurement was 44.3 mL (representing 2.37 % of the averaged liver volumes). The liver volume was neither dependent on the contrast phase (p = 0.697), nor on the slice thickness (p = 0.446). The mean processing time/dataset with the algorithm was 9.94 s (sec) compared to manual segmentation with 219.34 s. We found an excellent agreement between both approaches with an ICC value of 0.996.

CONCLUSION:

The results of our study demonstrate that AI-powered fully automated liver volumetric analyses can be done with excellent accuracy, reproducibility, robustness, speed and agreement with the manual segmentation.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Algorithms / Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Liver Diseases Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Eur J Radiol Year: 2020 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Algorithms / Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Liver Diseases Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Eur J Radiol Year: 2020 Document type: Article
...