Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ocular Clinical Signs and Diagnostic Tests Most Compatible With Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca: A Latent Class Approach.
Gonzales, John A; Shiboski, Stephen C; Bunya, Vatinee Y; Akpek, Esen K; Rose-Nussbaumer, Jennifer; Seitzman, Gerami D; Criswell, Lindsey A; Shiboski, Caroline H; Lietman, Thomas M.
Affiliation
  • Gonzales JA; Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
  • Shiboski SC; Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Bunya VY; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
  • Akpek EK; Department of Ophthalmology, Scheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Rose-Nussbaumer J; Ocular Surface Diseases and Dry Eye Clinic, The Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
  • Seitzman GD; The Johns Hopkins Jerome L. Greene Sjögren's Syndrome Center, Baltimore, MD.
  • Criswell LA; Department of Ophthalmology, Kaiser Permanente, Redwood City, CA.
  • Shiboski CH; Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
  • Lietman TM; Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Cornea ; 39(8): 1013-1016, 2020 Aug.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32251167
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the ocular signs and tests for keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS) in the absence of a gold standard.

METHODS:

Cross-sectional study of participants from the Sjögren's International Collaborative Clinical Alliance (SICCA) registry. Participants had oral/ocular/rheumatologic examinations, blood/saliva samples collected, and salivary gland biopsy. Latent class analysis (LCA) identified clusters of patients based on 3 to 4 predictor variables relating to signs or tests of KCS. The resulting model-based "gold standard" classification formed the basis for estimated sensitivity and specificity associated with these predictors.

RESULTS:

A total of 3514 participants were enrolled into SICCA, with 52.9% classified as SS. LCA revealed a best-fit model with 2 groups. For the gold standard-positive group, an abnormal tear breakup time, ocular staining score (OSS), and Schirmer I had a sensitivity of 99.5%, 91.0%, and 47.4%, respectively. For the gold standard-negative group, an abnormal tear breakup time, OSS, and Schirmer I had a specificity of 32.0%, 84.0%, and 88.5%, respectively. OSS components (fluorescein and lissamine staining), exhibited a sensitivity of 82.6% and 90.5%, respectively, in the gold standard-positive group, whereas these signs in the gold standard-negative group had a specificity of 88.8% and 73.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

OSS and its components (fluorescein and lissamine staining) differentiated 2 groups from each other better than other KCS parameters and had relatively high sensitivity and specificity.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Tears / Registries / Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca / Conjunctiva Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Cornea Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canada

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Tears / Registries / Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca / Conjunctiva Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Cornea Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canada
...