Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of sedentary behaviour interventions on biomarkers of cardiometabolic risk in adults: systematic review with meta-analyses.
Hadgraft, Nyssa T; Winkler, Elisabeth; Climie, Rachel E; Grace, Megan S; Romero, Lorena; Owen, Neville; Dunstan, David; Healy, Genevieve; Dempsey, Paddy C.
Affiliation
  • Hadgraft NT; Centre for Urban Transitions, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Winkler E; Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Climie RE; School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  • Grace MS; School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  • Romero L; Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Owen N; Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Dunstan D; The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Healy G; Centre for Urban Transitions, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Dempsey PC; Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Br J Sports Med ; 55(3): 144-154, 2021 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32269058
ABSTRACT
CONTEXT/

PURPOSE:

Observational and acute laboratory intervention research has shown that excessive sedentary time is associated adversely with cardiometabolic biomarkers. This systematic review with meta-analyses synthesises results from free living interventions targeting reductions in sedentary behaviour alone or combined with increases in physical activity.

METHODS:

Six electronic databases were searched up to August 2019 for sedentary behaviour interventions in adults lasting for ≥7 days publishing cardiometabolic biomarker outcomes covering body anthropometry, blood pressure, glucose and lipid metabolism, and inflammation (54 studies). The pooled effectiveness of intervention net of control on 15 biomarker outcomes was evaluated using random effects meta-analyses in the studies with control groups not providing other relevant interventions (33 studies; 6-25 interventions analysed).

RESULTS:

Interventions between 2 weeks and <6 months in non-clinical populations from North America, Europe and Australia comprised much of the evidence base. Pooled effects revealed small, significant (p<0.05) beneficial effects on weight (≈ -0.6 kg), waist circumference (≈ -0.7 cm), percentage body fat (≈ -0.3 %), systolic blood pressure (≈ -1.1 mm Hg), insulin (≈ -1.4 pM) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (≈ 0.04 mM). Pooled effects on the other biomarkers (p>0.05) were also small, and beneficial in direction except for fat-free mass (≈ 0.0 kg). Heterogeneity ranged widely (I2=0.0-72.9).

CONCLUSIONS:

Our review of interventions targeting sedentary behaviour reductions alone, or combined with increases in physical activity, found evidence of effectiveness for improving some cardiometabolic risk biomarkers to a small degree. There was insufficient evidence to evaluate inflammation or vascular function. Key limitations to the underlying evidence base include a paucity of high-quality studies, interventions lasting for ≥12 months, sensitive biomarkers and clinical study populations (eg, type 2 diabetes). PROSPERO TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42016041742.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Exercise / Sedentary Behavior / Cardiometabolic Risk Factors / Health Promotion Type of study: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Br J Sports Med Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Exercise / Sedentary Behavior / Cardiometabolic Risk Factors / Health Promotion Type of study: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Br J Sports Med Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia