Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Opioid prescription patterns among patients who doctor shop; Implications for providers.
Schneberk, Todd; Raffetto, Brian; Friedman, Joseph; Wilson, Andrew; Kim, David; Schriger, David L.
Affiliation
  • Schneberk T; Department of Emergency Medicine, Los Angeles County +University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
  • Raffetto B; Department of Emergency Medicine, Los Angeles County +University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
  • Friedman J; David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
  • Wilson A; Department of Neurology, Greater Los Angeles VA, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
  • Kim D; Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
  • Schriger DL; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
PLoS One ; 15(5): e0232533, 2020.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32453745
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Patients who doctor shop for opioids are a vulnerable population that present a difficult dilemma for their health care providers regarding best methods of immediate treatment and how to manage their risk of harm from opioids. We aim to describe and compare opioid prescription patterns among high quantity prescription patients who doctor shopped, high quantity prescription patients who did not (doctor shopping eligible patients), and the remaining patients who received opioid prescriptions to guide population health policies for high risk opioid use patients.

METHODS:

We performed a cross-sectional descriptive analysis of opioid prescriptions during an 8-year period using California's de-identified Controlled Substance Utilization Review and Evaluation System (CURES) database from years 2008-2015. We identified the prevalence of patients who doctor shopped and depicted their opioid prescription patterns including prescriber characteristics, in comparison to the aforementioned groups. Doctor shopping was defined by patients who received greater than 6 or more prescriptions from at least 6 different prescribers within 6 months of time.

RESULTS:

Among the 3 million individuals who received an opioid prescription during the 8-year period, 1.3% met the doctor shopper definition. These patients received high levels of chronic opioids with 82% and 33% averaging greater than 20 and 100 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) daily, respectively, in comparison to 72% and 18% in the doctor shopping eligible group. Patients who doctor shopped received a significant proportion of their MME from 1 main prescriber (54%) and only received 2-5% of their total MME from episodic care providers, despite 88% receiving a prescription from these providers.

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients who doctor shop are at high risk of opioid use disorder but represent a small fraction of those with dangerous opioid use. Furthermore, these individuals do not receive substantial opioids from episodic providers, which challenges the utility of prescription reduction programs in curbing use among this population. These results suggest we re-evaluate physician roles in the care of these patients and focus on referral to treatment and harm reduction strategies.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Inappropriate Prescribing / Prescription Drug Misuse / Analgesics, Opioid / Opioid-Related Disorders Type of study: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Inappropriate Prescribing / Prescription Drug Misuse / Analgesics, Opioid / Opioid-Related Disorders Type of study: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States