Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pelvic radiation therapy with volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy after renal transplant: A report of 3 cases.
Ileana, Pérez Álvarez Sandra; Rubi, Ramos Prudencio; Javier, Lozano Ruiz Francisco; Sagrario, Macías González Monserrat Del; Haydeé, Flores Balcazar Christian.
Affiliation
  • Ileana PÁS; Radiotherapy and Medical Physics Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán. 15 Vasco de Quiroga, Belisario Domínguez, Sección XVI, Tlalpan, Mexico City, 14080, Mexico.
  • Rubi RP; Radiotherapy and Medical Physics Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán. 15 Vasco de Quiroga, Belisario Domínguez, Sección XVI, Tlalpan, Mexico City, 14080, Mexico.
  • Javier LRF; Department of Radiation Oncology, Médica Sur Hospital. 150 Puente de Piedra, Toriello Guerra, Tlalpan, Mexico City, 14050, Mexico.
  • Sagrario MGMD; Hospital de Especialidades No. 25, Centro Médico del Noroeste. Lincoln y Fidel Velázquez Ave, Mitras Norte. Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64180, Mexico.
  • Haydeé FBC; Radiotherapy and Medical Physics Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán. 15 Vasco de Quiroga, Belisario Domínguez, Sección XVI, Tlalpan, Mexico City, 14080, Mexico.
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother ; 25(4): 548-555, 2020.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32494227
ABSTRACT

AIM:

Describe characteristics and outcomes of three patients treated with pelvic radiation therapy after kidney transplant.

BACKGROUND:

The incidence of pelvic cancers in kidney transplant (KT) recipients is rising. Currently it is the leading cause of death. Moreover, treatment is challenging because anatomical variants, comorbidities, and associated treatments, which raises the concern of using radiotherapy (RT). RT has been discouraged due to the increased risk of urethral/ureteral stricture and KT dysfunction. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We reviewed the electronic health records and digital planning system of patients treated with pelvic RT between December 2013 and December 2018 to identify patients with previous KT. CASES DESCRIPTION We describe three successful cases of KT patients in which modern techniques allowed full standard RT for pelvic malignances (2 prostate and 1 vaginal cancer) with or without elective pelvic nodal RT, without allograft toxicity at short and long follow-up (up to 60 months).

CONCLUSION:

When needed, RT modern techniques remain a valid option with excellent oncologic results and acceptable toxicity. Physicians should give special considerations to accomplish all OAR dose constraints in the patient's specific setting. Recent publications recommend KT mean dose <4 Gy, but graft proximity to CTV makes this unfeasible. We present 2 cases where dose constraint was not achieved, and to a short follow-up of 20 months renal toxicity has not been documented. We recommend the lowest possible mean dose to the KT, but never compromising the CTV coverage, since morbimortality from recurrent or progressive cancer disease outweighs the risk of graft injury.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Mexico

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Mexico