Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Access to Academic Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery Providers for New Patient Visits: How Long Are Wait Times?
Lee, Wai; Cheung, Alice; Du, Chris; Loeb, Charles; Cohen, Tal; Kapur, Anjali; Weissbart, Steven; Kim, Jason.
Affiliation
  • Lee W; Virginia Mason Seattle, WA, United States. Electronic address: Wai.Lee@gmail.com.
  • Cheung A; Albany Medical Center Albany, NY, United States, Department of Urology.
  • Du C; Stony Brook Medicine Stony Brook, NY, United States, Department of Urology.
  • Loeb C; University of California Irvine Irvine, CA, United States, Department of Urology.
  • Cohen T; Stony Brook Medicine Stony Brook, NY, United States, Department of Urology.
  • Kapur A; Stony Brook Medicine Stony Brook, NY, United States, Department of Urology.
  • Weissbart S; Stony Brook Medicine Stony Brook, NY, United States, Department of Urology.
  • Kim J; Stony Brook Medicine Stony Brook, NY, United States, Department of Urology.
Urology ; 150: 170-174, 2021 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32535074
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To determine the wait times to see an academic Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery (FPMRS) urologist or gynecologist and to identify factors that may impact these wait times.

METHODS:

We reviewed all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education accredited urology and gynecology residency programs. Offices of FPMRS providers were called to ascertain the earliest available new patient visit for a fictional female patient with "urine leakage." Programs without FPMRS faculty (18.7%) were excluded. FPMRS providers that did not accept Medicaid (15.6%) were also excluded. Negative binomial regression was performed using SPSS v24.

RESULTS:

Final analysis included 362 FPMRS providers. Median wait time for a patient with Medicaid was 30 days (interquartile range [IQR] 15-51) and 26 days (IQR 14-42) for Medicare. The median wait time to see an FPMRS-trained gynecologist was 28 days (IQR 15-50) while FPMRS-trained urologists had a median wait time of 25 days (IQR 13.8-43.3). Female providers had longer median wait times when compared to male providers (30 vs 25 days). On regression analysis, only female gender of the provider was significant (P < .01).

CONCLUSION:

Our study found that nearly 1 in 5 academic departments did not have an FPMRS-trained provider. We found that new patients with urinary incontinence encountered substantial wait times to see FPMRS providers at academic institutions. As we project increased demand for the FPMRS workforce, our findings reflect a challenging landscape where training additional FPMRS providers may be needed to meet demand.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Appointments and Schedules / Urinary Incontinence / Plastic Surgery Procedures / Pelvic Floor Disorders / Health Services Accessibility Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Urology Year: 2021 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Appointments and Schedules / Urinary Incontinence / Plastic Surgery Procedures / Pelvic Floor Disorders / Health Services Accessibility Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Urology Year: 2021 Document type: Article