Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The positive effect of tenting screws for primary horizontal guided bone regeneration: A retrospective study based on cone-beam computed tomography data.
César Neto, João B; Cavalcanti, Marília C; Sapata, Vitor M; Pannuti, Cláudio M; Hämmerle, Christoph H F; Naenni, Nadja; Thoma, Daniel S; Romito, Giuseppe A.
Affiliation
  • César Neto JB; Division of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Cavalcanti MC; Division of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Sapata VM; Division of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Pannuti CM; Division of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Hämmerle CHF; Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Naenni N; Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Thoma DS; Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Romito GA; Division of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 31(9): 846-855, 2020 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32562322
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To radiographically evaluate the effect of the adjunctive use of tenting screws (TS) for primary horizontal guided bone regeneration (GBR). MATERIALS &

METHODS:

Twenty-eight patients in need of staged bone augmentation were consecutively treated in a private practice. A xenogenic particulate bone substitute material (DBBM) and a resorbable collagen membrane were used in all patients. Subjects were divided into two groups control (conventional GBR; n = 22) and test (tenting screws in conjunction with GBR - TS; n = 22). CBCT images were obtained before augmentation and after 6-8 months. CBCTs were superimposed, and linear horizontal measurements were performed. Alveolar ridge width (RW) and ridge width change (RWchange) were assessed at 1, 3, 5, and 7 mm below the bone crest.

RESULTS:

Forty-four sites in 28 patients were evaluated. No differences between the groups were detected for RW at baseline (TS 5.87 ± 2.41; control 5.36 ± 1.65). Regarding RWchange, TS promoted an additional effect at 1 and 3 mm below the crest compared to control (p < .05; RWchange-1 TS 3.72 ± 2.46; control 1.25 ± 3.05; RWchange-3 TS 3.98 ± 2.53; control 2.50 ± 2.02). The final RW was greater in group TS compared to the control group at the 1, 3, and 5 mm level (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS:

The use of tenting screws exerted a positive effect on staged GBR with a greater final RW at the 3 mm level. In addition, GBR in conjunction with TS was able to provide consistent bone augmentation at lingual/palatal sites.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Oral Implants Res Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Publication country: DENMARK / DINAMARCA / DK

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Oral Implants Res Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Publication country: DENMARK / DINAMARCA / DK