Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Using Implementation Science to Disseminate a Lung Cancer Screening Education Intervention Through Community Health Workers.
Williams, Lovoria B; Shelton, Brent J; Gomez, Maria L; Al-Mrayat, Yazan D; Studts, Jamie L.
Affiliation
  • Williams LB; College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, 751 Rose St. 531 College of Nursing Building, Lexington, KY, 40536-0232, USA. Lovoria.Williams@uky.edu.
  • Shelton BJ; College of Medicine, Cancer Biostatistics within the Division of Medical Oncology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
  • Gomez ML; College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, 751 Rose St. 531 College of Nursing Building, Lexington, KY, 40536-0232, USA.
  • Al-Mrayat YD; College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, 751 Rose St. 531 College of Nursing Building, Lexington, KY, 40536-0232, USA.
  • Studts JL; Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA.
J Community Health ; 46(1): 165-173, 2021 02.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32594413
ABSTRACT
National lung cancer screening with low dose computed tomography (LDCT) uptake is suboptimal. One factor contributing to slow uptake is lack of awareness. Trained Community Health Workers (CHWs) may be effective in increasing lung cancer screening awareness among disparate populations, however little is known about the processes necessary to scale an intervention for implementation by CHWs in a new area. We examined implementation processes with the RE-AIM framework and pilot tested a CHW-delivered lung cancer education intervention based on the Health Belief Model. We measured pre-post participant knowledge, attitudes and beliefs regarding cancer screening, lung cancer stigma, and intent to obtain LDCT screening. We used community-engaged strategies to collaborate with a local health system, to identify CHWs. CHWs were trained to recruit participants and deliver the one-session lung cancer education intervention. Seven CHWs and eight community sites participated. Participants (n = 77) were female (53%) primarily low income (62.9%); tobacco use was high (36.9%). Post intervention changes in lung cancer screening knowledge (p = < .0001), attitudes regarding lung cancer screening benefit (p = .034) and lung cancer stigma. (p = .024) We learned important lessons that will be useful in subsequent scaling. Collaborating with a local health system is a promising method to disseminate a lung cancer screening education intervention.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Mass Screening / Health Education / Community Health Workers / Early Detection of Cancer / Implementation Science / Lung Neoplasms Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies / Sysrev_observational_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Implementation_research Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: J Community Health Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Mass Screening / Health Education / Community Health Workers / Early Detection of Cancer / Implementation Science / Lung Neoplasms Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies / Sysrev_observational_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Implementation_research Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: J Community Health Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States