Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is reduction of routine radiograph use in patients with distal radius fractures cost effective? Analysis of data from the multicentre, randomised controlled WARRIOR trial.
van Gerven, Pieter; van Dongen, Johanna M; Rubinstein, Sidney M; Termaat, Marco F; El Moumni, Mostafa; Zuidema, Wietse P; Krijnen, Pieta; Schipper, Inger B; van Tulder, Maurits W.
Affiliation
  • van Gerven P; Trauma Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands p.van_gerven@lumc.nl.
  • van Dongen JM; Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Amsterdam Movement Sciences research institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Rubinstein SM; Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Amsterdam Movement Sciences research institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Termaat MF; Trauma Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • El Moumni M; Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Zuidema WP; Trauma Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Krijnen P; Trauma Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Schipper IB; Trauma Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • van Tulder MW; Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Amsterdam Movement Sciences research institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
BMJ Open ; 10(7): e035370, 2020 07 05.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32624472
OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost effectiveness of a reduced imaging follow-up protocol of distal radius fractures compared with usual care. DESIGN: An economical evaluation conducted alongside a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT). SETTING: Four level-one trauma centres in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 341 patients participated (usual care (n=172), reduced imaging (n=169)). INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomised to usual care (routine radiography at 1, 2, 6 and 12 weeks) or a reduced imaging strategy (radiographs at 6 and 12 weeks only for a clinical indication). OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional outcome was assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) using the EuroQol-5Dimensions-3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L). Costs were measured using self-reported questionnaires and medical records, and analysed from a societal perspective. Multiple imputation, seemingly unrelated regression analysis and bootstrapping were used to analyse the data. RESULTS: Clinical overall outcomes of both groups were comparable. The difference in DASH was -2.03 (95% CI -4.83 to 0.77) and the difference in QALYs was 0.025 (95% CI -0.01 to 0.06). Patients in the reduced imaging group received on average 3.3 radiographs (SD: 1.9) compared with 4.2 (SD: 1.9) in the usual care group. Costs for radiographic imaging were significantly lower in the reduced imaging group than in the usual care group (€-48 per patient, 95% CI -68 to -27). There was no difference in total costs between groups (€-401 per patient, 95% CI -2453 to 1251). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for QALYs was -15 872; the ICER for the DASH was 198. The probability of reduced imaging being cost effective compared with usual care ranged from 0.8 to 0.9 at a willingness to pay of €20 000/QALY to €80 000/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a reduced imaging strategy in the follow-up of distal radius fractures has a high probability of being cost effective for QALYs, without decreasing functional outcome. We, therefore, recommend imaging only when clinically indicated. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The Netherlands trial register (NL4477).
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radius Fractures / Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Radiography / Cost-Benefit Analysis Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radius Fractures / Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Radiography / Cost-Benefit Analysis Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands Country of publication: United kingdom