Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A significant increase in exercise test performance with virtual group motivation: a randomised open-label controlled trial.
Wilzeck, Verena C; Hufschmid, Janik; Bischof, Louis; Hansi, Christopher; Nägele, Matthias P; Beer, Juerg H; Hufschmid, Urs.
Affiliation
  • Wilzeck VC; Department of Medicine, Cantonal Hospital of Baden, Switzerland.
  • Hufschmid J; Old Cantonal High School, Aarau, Switzerland.
  • Bischof L; Old Cantonal High School, Aarau, Switzerland.
  • Hansi C; Department of Medicine, Cantonal Hospital of Baden, Switzerland.
  • Nägele MP; Department of Medicine, Cantonal Hospital of Baden, Switzerland.
  • Beer JH; Department of Medicine, Cantonal Hospital of Baden, Switzerland / Centre of Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Hufschmid U; Department of Medicine, Cantonal Hospital of Baden, Switzerland / 0041564862637 | 00414862636.
Swiss Med Wkly ; 150: w20287, 2020 Jul 13.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32725609
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

Exercise stress testing is frequently used for the assessment of coronary artery disease. As the validity of the test result is highly dependent on the patient’s cooperation and motivation, we hypothesised that virtual group motivation would result in a higher exercise capacity and may increase the test’s validity.

METHODS:

108 patients at a Swiss teaching hospital with an indication for exercise testing were included in a controlled, open-label trial and randomised 11 to treadmill exercise testing whilst either watching a video of a walking group (video group, n = 43), or watching a static image of flowers (image group, n = 43). The video showed a group of five amateur runners, giving the patients the impression of running within the group. As primary outcomes, the performance achieved and the perceived level of comfort during the test were analysed.

RESULTS:

The video group achieved significantly higher percentages of their age-predicted METs (149 ± 32% vs 135 ± 29%, p = 0.041) and longer exercise durations (1112 ± 254 min vs 0854 ± 0239 min, p <0.001). Levels of comfort (8.4 ± 1.4 vs 7.5 ± 1.7 analogue scale, p = 0.011) and closeness to their physical limits (8.9 ± 0.8 vs 8.1 ± 1.5, p = 0.005) were rated significantly higher by patients in the video group.

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients watching a video of a running group achieved significantly higher maximum exercise levels and longer test durations. This may have implications for the test’s validity. Furthermore, the virtual setting enhanced patient comfort. (This trial was formally registered at clinicaltrials.gov trial ID NCT03704493.).
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Running / Coronary Artery Disease Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Swiss Med Wkly Journal subject: MEDICINA Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Switzerland

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Running / Coronary Artery Disease Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Swiss Med Wkly Journal subject: MEDICINA Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Switzerland
...