Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Care priorities for stroke patients developing cognitive difficulties: a Delphi survey of UK professional views.
Tang, Eugene Y H; Robinson, Louise; Exley, Catherine; Flynn, Darren; Stephan, Blossom C M; Price, Christopher.
Affiliation
  • Tang EYH; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Level 2, Newcastle Biomedical Research Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 5PL, UK. e.y.h.tang@newcastle.ac.uk.
  • Robinson L; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Level 2, Newcastle Biomedical Research Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 5PL, UK.
  • Exley C; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Level 2, Newcastle Biomedical Research Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 5PL, UK.
  • Flynn D; Centre for Rehabilitation, Exercise and Sports Science, School of Health & Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, Tees Valley, TS1 3BX, UK.
  • Stephan BCM; Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
  • Price C; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Level 2, Newcastle Biomedical Research Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 5PL, UK.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 20(1): 717, 2020 Aug 05.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32758214
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Post stroke cognitive difficulties are common but generally prioritised below other impairments. In the UK, clinical guidelines recommend a holistic review at six-months post-stroke including an assessment of cognitive function. In order to assist clinicians to provide better care for patients with post-stroke cognitive deficits and assist with service planning, our aim was to establish professional consensus on key actions at the six-month review.

METHODS:

An electronic Delphi survey was developed with ten potential actions for clinicians to prioritise across five different clinical scenarios describing patients with cognitive difficulties. Scenarios varied in terms of age of the stroke-survivor, stroke severity and use of dementia risk assessment. A panel of professional volunteers was obtained through the British Association of Stroke Physicians and the UK National Stroke Nursing Forum.

RESULTS:

Forty-five stroke clinicians completed round one, with 21 participants completing round two. Priorities consistently supported by professionals included access to psychological services, screening for a mood disorder and ensuring multi-professional input. Direct access to specialist memory services was not generally supported unless a dementia risk assessment tool indicated that the individual was at high risk of dementia.

CONCLUSIONS:

Assessment of post-stroke cognitive deficits needs to be routinely considered during the six-month review. A formal risk assessment tool could be a way to streamline direct access to memory clinic services to ensure that individuals at-risk of dementia receive ongoing care.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cognition Disorders / Stroke / Health Priorities Type of study: Guideline / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Journal subject: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cognition Disorders / Stroke / Health Priorities Type of study: Guideline / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Journal subject: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom