Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Observational Real-World Study to Assess Clinical Characteristics and Device Satisfaction in Patients with COPD Treated with Glycopyrrolate/eFlow® CS.
Stephenson, Judith J; Dembek, Carole; Caldwell-Tarr, Amanda; Conto, Rebecca M; Paullin, Mark; Kerwin, Edward M.
Affiliation
  • Stephenson JJ; HealthCore Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA.
  • Dembek C; Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Marlborough, MA, USA.
  • Caldwell-Tarr A; HealthCore Inc., Watertown, MA, USA.
  • Conto RM; HealthCore Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA.
  • Paullin M; HealthCore Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA.
  • Kerwin EM; Clinical Research Institute of Southern Oregon, Medford, OR, USA.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis ; 15: 1713-1727, 2020.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32764916
Purpose: To assess clinical characteristics and device satisfaction of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treated with glycopyrrolate/eFlow® Closed System (CS) nebulizer (further referred to as eFlow) under real-world conditions. Participants and Methods: Patients with COPD currently using eFlow were identified by the study sponsor. Consenting patients who met study inclusion criteria completed a cross-sectional survey that included a device satisfaction questionnaire. Means, medians, and standard deviations were calculated. Results: Sixty-six patients met inclusion criteria and completed the survey. Participants' mean ± standard deviation age was 64.9 ± 11.9 years and the majority were white (86.4%) and female (59.1%). Almost two-thirds were former smokers. Thirty-nine (59.1%) reported their COPD to be severe/very severe and 38 (57.6%) reported a COPD exacerbation resulting in a hospitalization, ER visit, or medication modification over the past 12 months. Among 55 participants who had previously used another type of nebulizer, 44 (80%) were overall "much more"/"somewhat more" satisfied with the eFlow compared with their previous nebulizer(s). Regardless of prior nebulizer use, 60 (90.9%) participants were "satisfied"/"very satisfied" overall with the eFlow. Assembly and disassembly, operation, and cleaning were perceived as being "easy"/"very easy" by at least 65% of participants. Among all participants, 57 (86.4%) were "confident"/"very confident" of glycopyrrolate administration. On a Likert scale of 1 ("I don't like it") to 7 ("I like it a lot"), mean scores were at least 5.9 for portability, ease of cleaning, size, weight, short administration time, and relative silence of the device. Over 80% of participants said they "probably"/"definitely" would continue to use eFlow. Conclusion: Based on this real-world study, the majority of patients were highly satisfied with, and confident in, using eFlow.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive / Glycopyrrolate Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: New Zealand

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive / Glycopyrrolate Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: New Zealand