Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the WHO-5, in adults and older adults for its use in primary care settings.
Eser, Erhan; Çevik, Celalettin; Baydur, Hakan; Günes, Soner; Esgin, Tayfun Alperen; Öztekin, Çaglar Sögüt; Eker, Esen; Gümüssoy, Ufuk; Eser, Gün Baris; Özyurt, Beyhan.
Affiliation
  • Eser E; Department of Public Health, Manisa Celal Bayar University School of Medicine, Turkey.
  • Çevik C; Department of Nursing, Balikesir University Faculty of Health Sciences, Turkey.
  • Baydur H; Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Social Work, Manisa Celal Bayar University, Turkey.
  • Günes S; Department of Public Health, Balikesir University School of Medicine, Turkey.
  • Esgin TA; Department of Public Health, Manisa Celal Bayar University School of Medicine, Turkey.
  • Öztekin ÇS; Department of Public Health, Manisa Celal Bayar University School of Medicine, Turkey.
  • Eker E; Department of Public Health, Çanakkale 18 Mart University School of Medicine, Turkey.
  • Gümüssoy U; Manisa Province Health Directorate, Turkey.
  • Eser GB; School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Erasmus University, Netherlands.
  • Özyurt B; Department of Public Health, Manisa Celal Bayar University School of Medicine, Turkey.
Prim Health Care Res Dev ; 20: e100, 2019 07 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32800004
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This study aims to determine the psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5) Turkish version in Turkish adults and older adults.

METHODS:

This is a multicenter cultural adaptation study carried out with 1752 participants. Internal consistency (by Cronbach's alpha); Construct validity (by known groups and confirmatory factor analysis-CFI) and discriminant validity are evaluated stratified by adults and older adults. Cohen's Effect Size is used in known groups and discriminant validity analyses.

RESULTS:

Distribution properties of the WHO-5 Turkish version are in acceptable limits. Alpha values are 0.81 for adults and 0.86 for older adults. The variances of the 58.5% of the adults sample and 63.9% of the older adults sample are explained in Exploratory FA. Model fits (CFI) are satisfactory ( > 0.95) in both samples; but RMSEA is poor in the older adults sample (0.166) whereas it is acceptable (0.073) in the adults sample. Known groups validity and discriminant analyses are satisfactory in both adults and older adults.

CONCLUSION:

The WHO-5 Turkish version has a good measurement capacity, internal consistency and good model fits in both samples. The error values in the older adults group suggest that the results when testing older adults should be interpreted with caution.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Primary Health Care / World Health Organization / Health Status / Surveys and Questionnaires / Culturally Competent Care Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Equity_inequality / Patient_preference Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: Prim Health Care Res Dev Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Turkey

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Primary Health Care / World Health Organization / Health Status / Surveys and Questionnaires / Culturally Competent Care Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Equity_inequality / Patient_preference Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: Prim Health Care Res Dev Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Turkey