Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A national research centre for the evaluation and implementation of person-centred care: Content from the first interventional studies.
Gyllensten, Hanna; Björkman, Ida; Jakobsson Ung, Eva; Ekman, Inger; Jakobsson, Sofie.
Affiliation
  • Gyllensten H; Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Björkman I; Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Jakobsson Ung E; Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Ekman I; Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Jakobsson S; Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Health Expect ; 23(5): 1362-1375, 2020 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32808455
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Person-centred care (PCC) has been suggested as a potential means to improve the care of patients with chronic and long-term disorders. In this regard, a model for PCC was developed by the University of Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC).

OBJECTIVE:

The present study aimed to explore the theoretical frameworks, designs, contexts and intervention characteristics in the first 27 interventional studies conducted based on the ethics for person-centredness provided by the GPCC.

DESIGN:

Cross-sectional study. SETTING AND

PARTICIPANTS:

A questionnaire to the principal investigators of the 27 intervention studies financed by the GPCC and conducted between 2010 and 2016. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Theoretical frameworks, contexts of studies, person-centred ethic, and outcome measures.

RESULTS:

Most of the interventions were based on the same ethical assumptions for person-centredness but theories and models in applying the interventions differed. All studies were controlled; 12 randomized and 15 quasi-experimental. Hospital in- and outpatient and primary care settings were represented and the outcome measures were related to the specific theories used. A complexity in designing, introducing and evaluating PCC interventions was evident.

CONCLUSION:

The frameworks, designs and interventions in the studies were in line with the established ethical basis of PCC, whereas outcome measures varied widely. Consensus discussions among researchers in the field are needed to make comparisons between studies feasible. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTIONS Patients or the public made no direct contributions, although most of the studied projects included such initiatives.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Self Care / Patient-Centered Care Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Ethics Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Health Expect Journal subject: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE / SAUDE PUBLICA Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Sweden Publication country: ENGLAND / ESCOCIA / GB / GREAT BRITAIN / INGLATERRA / REINO UNIDO / SCOTLAND / UK / UNITED KINGDOM

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Self Care / Patient-Centered Care Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Ethics Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Health Expect Journal subject: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE / SAUDE PUBLICA Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Sweden Publication country: ENGLAND / ESCOCIA / GB / GREAT BRITAIN / INGLATERRA / REINO UNIDO / SCOTLAND / UK / UNITED KINGDOM